The Bangkok Post reported today (22 Aug 2015 at 06:37am local time):
[...]
[Police] Gen Somyot also dismissed a report by The Times journalist Richard Lloyd Parry that stated Thai authorities investigating Monday’s bombing were focusing on a foreign man with a Muslim name, Mohammad Museyin.
The police chief said police did not have that information and he had no idea from where The Times got the name.
Gen Prayut confirmed police have not revealed any names of suspects in the bombing and said he was also at a loss to explain how The Times had obtained the information.
[...]
But much of the report is given to relaying stern warnings from Thai police and government officials to "netizens" to stop spreading misleading and confusing rumors about the bombing.
(This prompted one Thai to write in the Post's comment section, "I believe and understand that the most conflicting and confusing information comes from Police and Government officials themselves.")
The warnings, while over the top, are a good reminder to everyone to be careful about playing armchair detective about a terrorist incident in an era when just a few sentences posted to a social media site can set off mass panic and false accusations.
I note that the only press to touch the Parry account naming “Mohamad Museyin” were two Australian outlets — Herald Sun and Sky News Australia.
I am annoyed with myself because I fell for the report at Sky News. Serves me right for not waiting for verification from the police before posting the report, and I owe Pundita readers an apology for my hastiness. I corrected the post early this morning but by then it was several hours after I'd first published about the story.
However, the Bangkok Post report does not explain how the Mohammad Museyin story got underway. For that background, which is instructive, I turn to the report I used to update my earlier post:
21 August 2015, Last update at 17:09:00 GMT
Khaosod English
BANGKOK — Police have denied a news report earlier today claiming two witnesses who said they interacted with the suspected Bangkok bomber had positively identified him in a passport photo shown to them by authorities.
While one suspect remains the singular focus of intense scrutiny and speculation behind Monday’s deadly bombing at the Erawan Shrine, police refuted a reportfrom correspondent Richard Lloyd Parry claiming one witness was “100 percent sure” the suspect was the same man whose passport photo was shown to him.
“I don't know who the source in this story is, but let me insist that police are working based on the evidence that we have,” outgoing national police chief Somyot Pumpanmuang told reporters this afternoon when asked about the report.
Somyot denied the man named in the news report was a person of interest. Asked specifically if investigators have linked any name to the suspected bomber yet, Somyot said “not yet.”
“But even if I have the name, I wouldn't necessarily tell the media, because it won't do anyone any good,” he said.
Earlier today the account was posted by correspondent Richard Lloyd Parry on his Facebook [page], who said the story was only published in electronic editions of the paper this morning and not available online. Parry is a correspondent for London-based The Times.
“When the police showed me the pictures, I recognised him immediately,” the report quotes a Nikhom Tantula, who is said to be one of two motorcycle taxis who stepped forward to say they had given the suspect a ride.
“I said: ‘I’m 100 percent sure'. They asked me some questions, but not many. It’s strange.”
Nikhom, in Parry’s account, said he gave ride to the suspect eight days in a row in February, always at 5:30am from a stand on Sathorn Road and was confident it was the same man shown to him in a passport photo shown to him by an immigration official.
Nikhom recounted taking the man, Parry wrote, to a hotel close to Asoke Hospital in central Bangkok.
While there is no listing for an Asoke Hospital, there is an Asoke Skin Hospital near the MRT Petchaburi station on Asok-Din Daeng Road.
The name identified in Parry's report is "Mohamad Museyin." Perry's [sic] account appears to rely on spelling seen by the two men on the passport page shown to them. Searching public records finds few references to a Museyin family name, and it could be a possible misspelling of Huseyin, a common name in Turkey.
In Turkey, Huseyin is a common rendering of a common name spelled elsewhere as Hussein.
That possibility is likely to fan the flames of suspicion the attacker might have been acting over anger about Thailand's forcible return of more than 100 Uighur refugees to China in July. The day after they were deported, an angry mob ransacked the Thai Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.
Since Monday’s deadly attack, which killed at least 20 and wounded more than 150, public signals from investigators have centered on one man seen in CCTV footage leaving a backpack in the shrine minutes before the blast.
Debate has swirled about his identity, with no conclusive evidence provided as to his nationality or ethnic background, despite a wash of rumors and claims.
[END REPORT]********
No comments:
Post a Comment