Pakistan sets Mullah Omar deathtrap to disrupt U.S.-Taliban talksHughes goes on to talk about the Haqqani Network; worth the read.
Michael Hughes
May 18, 2011
The Examiner
An Afghan security official told [Afghanistan's] TOLO news on Tuesday that Pakistan’s spy agency is scheming to move Taliban leader Mullah Omar from Pakistan to Helmand province and then report his whereabouts to U.S. forces.
The Pakistanis hope Omar is killed on Afghan soil because it will prove terrorist leaders are also hiding in Afghanistan, the source claimed. The same Afghan official said Omar received the ISI order to leave Quetta from former Pakistani spy chief Hamid Gul.
Such a development would disrupt the negotiations reportedly underway between the U.S. and the Taliban. According to the Washington Post, a U.S. representative attended at least three meetings in Qatar and Germany within the last eight or nine days with a Taliban official who is close to Mullah Omar.
U.S. officials claim “exploratory” conversations which began in February have advanced significantly in terms of substance and willingness to engage. The commencement of dialogue predated the Osama bin Laden assassination, but the death of the Al Qaeda leader has put more pressure on insurgent leaders to compromise, experts say.
Rumors of the talks have been chastised by critics who believe that such negotiations will compromise Afghan democracy because it appears Kabul and Washington are seriously considering bestowing the Taliban with whatever the insurgents consider an “acceptable share of political power.” This would undermine Afghan self-determination by handing over partial control of Afghanistan to the Taliban without the consent of the governed.
Afghan native Khalil Nouri, co-founder of the New World Strategies Coalition (NWSC) commented today in The Huffington Post that “there can only be one legitimate way to obtain stability in Afghanistan; through an all Afghan national ratification of a reconciliation process”. Afghans like Nouri believe neither the U.S. nor the Karzai administration has the legitimacy or the proper mandate to negotiate a settlement on behalf of the Afghan people.
An American official reported that “the Afghans have been fully briefed” on U.S.-Taliban contacts and “the Pakistanis only partially so” because the Obama administration is now of the mind that negotiation with the Quetta Shura does not require Pakistan’s cooperation. One senior administration official was even quoted as saying:
“Some people who have met with the Taliban say that among the reasons [the insurgents] want to establish their own office is so they can get out from under the Pakistanis”.
[...]
Translate
Showing posts with label Mullah Omar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mullah Omar. Show all posts
Thursday, May 19
Is Pakistan's ISI trying to sneak Mullah Omar into Afghanistan?
If the Afghan source isn't blowing smoke this report is a riot. There is no honor among thieves, fer sure. I'm getting such a chuckle from the story I'm lapsing into Valley Girl Speak, fer sure. But hey by any which way getting hold of Omar would be fine with me. See the Examiner website for report's source links.
Tuesday, May 11
Al Qaeda undermines Mullah Omar's authority over hostage deal
More news about crazy people
Pakistan's military is trying to negotiate with 'good' Taliban to avoid a war in N. Waziristan. Meanwhile al Qaeda, ticked off by recent developments, pressures Asian Tigers terror group into flip-flopping on their agreement to release two hostages, which meant dissing Mullah Omar. Tsk tsk. Manners!
See a blurb from the (U.K.) Guardian, posted after the following report, for background on the Asian Tigers, which no one had heard of before last month. Here, the Pakistan bureau chief for the Asia Times Online lays out the AQ-Tigers-Omar kerfuffle, which suggests too many chefs elbowing each other in the kitchen:
Pakistan's military is trying to negotiate with 'good' Taliban to avoid a war in N. Waziristan. Meanwhile al Qaeda, ticked off by recent developments, pressures Asian Tigers terror group into flip-flopping on their agreement to release two hostages, which meant dissing Mullah Omar. Tsk tsk. Manners!
See a blurb from the (U.K.) Guardian, posted after the following report, for background on the Asian Tigers, which no one had heard of before last month. Here, the Pakistan bureau chief for the Asia Times Online lays out the AQ-Tigers-Omar kerfuffle, which suggests too many chefs elbowing each other in the kitchen:
Militants in no mood to talkFrom the May 6 issue of the Guardian:
By Syed Saleem Shahzad
Asia Times Online
May 11, 2010
ISLAMABAD - Pakistan stands at a crossroad in its battle against militancy.
On the one hand, its Washington ally wants to turn their strategic partnership into a closer military alliance in which the United States would help the Pakistani military significantly ramp up the war against militancy - meaning opening a new battlefield, as the Americans did in Laos during the Vietnam war.
Alternatively, Pakistan is tempted to set aside American interests and apply its own mechanism to defeat militancy - which means striking deals with the "good" Taliban and defeating the "bad" Taliban without care for the consequences on the war in
Afghanistan or the future of al-Qaeda and its allied Punjabi groups operating in the Pakistani tribal areas.
Pakistan took a step towards the second option at the weekend when it air-dropped leaflets in the North Waziristan tribal area warning pro-Taliban tribes "to back out of their support of the militants [al-Qaeda and its associate Punjabi militants] or face the consequences, like the people of Swat and Bajaur -tribal agencies] faced and lost their properties and assets".
For hawkish decision-makers in Washington and "bad" militants in North Waziristan, there is another option: remove Pakistani links in the war and deal directly with one another on Pakistani soil.
Last week, the Barack Obama administration authorized the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to step up drone attacks on militants in the tribal areas to include missile strikes against unknown targets. Previously, a suspect had to be identified. [Pundita note: Seems Bush authorized the 'no name' strikes in the closing months of his admininistration and they're being used for first time now.] The CIA wasted no time. In a series of attacks over the weekend, at least 10 militants were reported killed in North Waziristan.
The hardcore militants also flexed their muscles by blocking efforts led by the Afghan Taliban, who are not hostile towards Pakistan, for a truce and for the release of a former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) hostage.
Colonel Ameer Sultan Tarrar, nicknamed "Colonel Imam" by the mujahideen as he was instrumental in helping to raise the Taliban militia, was abducted by a Punjabi group, the Asian Tigers, on March 25, along with journalist Asad Qureshi. The bullet-riddled body of Khalid Khawaja, another former ISI official who was abducted at the same time, was recently found in North Waziristan.
The Tigers ignored instructions from Taliban leader Mullah Omar that the men should be freed, instead issuing a list of high-profile men in Pakistani jails to be released in 15 days. Otherwise, they said, Tarrar would meet the same fate as Khawaja. For the release of Qureshi, there is a separate demand of US$10 million in ransom. See Qureshi's video ... sent to ATol at the weekend.
The New York Times reported on Friday that evidence of ties between the man accused of trying to car bomb Times Square in New York - Faisal Shahzad - and Pakistani militants had intensified debate inside the Barack Obama administration about expanding America's military presence in Pakistan. Some officials are said to want to increase the number of special operations forces working with Pakistani troops in the western mountains.
In a dispatch from Washington, the newspaper said the American military presence in Pakistan had already grown substantially over the past year, and now totaled more than 200 troops, part of a largely secret program to share intelligence with the Pakistani army and paramilitary troops and train them to battle militant groups.
This would play into the hands of the militants, who aim to lure the Americans into what they see as a trap in the rugged mountainous terrain on Pakistan's border with Afghanistan.
Militants make demands
Among the 150 prisoners the militants want released are those involved in an attack on military headquarters in Rawalpindi, the killing of a retired general, abductions for ransom, and those allegedly connected to the attack on Mumbai in India in November 2008. Interior Minister Rahman Malik, who is traveling in Britain, was unable to respond to questions from Asia Times Online.
The militants had initially said they would release both captives.
A militant spokesman, Usman Punjabi, told ATol on April 29 on the telephone that Khawaja would be executed (which happened the next day) but that Colonel Imam would be released as he was not a part of Khawaja's plan to negotiate peace between the militants and the military,
Other sources told ATol that Colonel Imam was to be released because of pressure from the Afghan Taliban and that he would be handed into the custody of Afghan Taliban commander Jalaluddin Haqqani's group led by Hafiz Gul Bahadur, the chief of the Taliban in North Waziristan. This was also widely reported in the Pakistani media.
However, everything changed with the arrest of Faisal Shahzad in New York and the ramping up of the drone program. Al-Qaeda forcibly put its foot down and managed to undermine the authority of Mullah Omar.
"It was completely wrong news that we agree to the release of Colonel Imam and Asad Qureshi," Usman Punjabi told ATol on the telephone on Sunday. "We did not receive any direct instruction from Mullah Omar. We did not see any direct emissary of Mullah Omar's. What we heard regarding the instructions [from Mullah Omar] was just talk by some ISI-backed Taliban groups in North Waziristan that they had been asked by Mullah Omar to release Colonel Imam.
"So we have asked them to provide evidence - any audio or video recording of Mullah Omar in which he ordered the release of Colonel Imam. We cannot believe the words of just any person in that regard," said Usman Punjabi.
"For us Colonel Imam was not a mujahid. If he was assumed in the past as the father of the Taliban, he did that as a government employee - being an army officer. He still receives a pension from the Pakistan army. To us he is their man," said Usman Punjabi. This is in direct contradiction to what he earlier told ATol, that Colonel Imam would be released.
It is becoming apparent that al-Qaeda is calling the shots in North Waziristan and creating a situation under which the good and bad Taliban will not have any choice but to operate under al-Qaeda's flagship while trying to entice the US into a fight.
Syed Saleem Shahzad is Asia Times Online's Pakistan Bureau Chief. He can be reached at saleem_shahzad2002@yahoo.com
[...] Unheard of until last month, Asian Tigers is a new Taliban splinter group based in North Waziristan with a taste for brutal kidnappings. It is thought to be led by Punjabi sectarian extremists, probably with the Lashkar i Jhangvi group, who have taken shelter in the tribal belt.
The group shot to prominence with the kidnapping of two retired ISI officers and a journalist, Asad Qureshi. Last week the group executed one of the ISI men, Khalid Khawaja, and threatened to kill the others unless its demands for money and prisoners were met.
The size and influence of the group are unclear but there is some speculation that Asian Tigers have links with [Hakeemullah] Mehsud's TTP. Its emergence underscores how Pakistan's jihadi firmament is fragmenting and reshaping – a phenomenon that boosts the chances of infighting but also makes it more difficult to stamp out militancy. [..]
Labels:
Al Qaeda,
Asian Tigers,
Mullah Omar,
Pakistan,
Syed Saleem Shahzad
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)