Translate

Tuesday, January 26

Larry Johnson puts together one piece of the Benghazi 9/11 puzzle

No Quarter's Larry Johnson, ex-CIA, ex-State Department, knows in exact detail the protocols the U.S. government follows the minute it's alerted about an attack on an American government installation anywhere in the world.

On Friday night, January 22, 2016, Larry sat on the phone with John Batchelor and detailed for John's radio audience the protocols that should have been followed when the U.S. mission in Benghazi was attacked on September 11, 2012 -- and he explains that the protocols weren't followed. (Podcast).

To get this question out of the way: is it possible that Larry's information was out of date or his description uninformed about what should have happened at the State Department during the attack?

From comments he's made over the years during his appearances on the John Batchelor Show, my understanding is that since leaving government employment Larry has worked as a contractor for the Department of Defense and retained extensive contacts in the American defense/ intelligence communities and at State. So I find it unlikely he would have brought inaccurate information to the discussion.      

I warn readers, Americans in particular, that the discussion while crystal clear is difficult listening. It gets even harder if you're aware that prior to the attack some persons in the U.S. military must have had knowledge that an attack on the Benghazi mission on September 11, 2102 was in the planning stage -- unless we are to believe that the Department of Defense threw together a very detailed report on the planning and planners within 24 hours of the attack.

It took Judicial Watch a lawsuit, FOIA filings and a wait of two years to obtain the detailed report, which JW published on their website May 18, 2015 under the somewhat confusing headline, Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance

This doesn't mean the Obama Administration knew of the attack 10 days in advance. It means the U.S. military had at some point obtained intelligence that planning for the attack had started at least 10 days prior to the attack. The reason for the confusing headline is that Judicial Watch was focused on demonstrating that the Obama Administration had been quickly informed that the attack was a well-planned terrorist one, not a spontaneous riot as the administration had told the public in the weeks following the attack:

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance. Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts. 
The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria. The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.
The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”
Spelling and punctuation is duplicated in this release without corrections.
Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.”  
The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council.  The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).”  The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”
"The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings."
[...]
Now, exactly at what point did the military obtain this wealth of intelligence about the planned attack? Aye, that's the question, isn't it?

Again, did the military scare up the intelligence within 24 hours after the fact of the attack?  If they obtained it earlier, was it forwarded to the White House, CIA, State Department, and all relevant military agencies -- and Ambassador Stevens? If not, why not?  And if it was forwarded, was it overlooked or ignored? But if the intelligence was seen prior to the attack -- how is that Ambassador Stevens and the other American staff in Benghazi weren't extracted prior to September 11, the date of the planned attack?

Another important question would be exactly which agency or agencies obtained the intelligence that the Defense Department turned over to the Obama Administration on September 12, 2012. Not to be tacky, but there is the matter of a great many people dead by the most horrible means -- even if it isn't the 250,000 figure the UN likes so much -- and a country reduced to ruins by the most horrible means, and then there are all those annoying refugees. 

Again, not to be tacky but one would want to know, I would want to know, whether the intelligence obtained by DoD about the Benghazi attack came from the CIA. Perhaps you can see where I'm headed with this. Or perhaps not, if you don't share my suspicion that defense policy for the erstwhile "republic" of the United States of America and NATO has for a half century been run from a post box in Riyadh.   
       
********

Oh, $681 million from Al Saud was only a personal gift so that's okay

Top prize for Hilarious Report of the Week goes to Reuters for this howler, published today: 
Probe clears Malaysian PM Najib, says $681 million transfer a Saudi gift
Malaysia's attorney-general cleared Prime Minister Najib Razak of any criminal offense or corruption on Tuesday, and said a controversial transfer of $681 million into his personal bank account was a gift from Saudi Arabia's royal family.

The leader of the main opposition party denounced the findings, which came after months of pressure on Najib to resign over the scandal, saying the appointment of the attorney-general by the prime minister himself suggested a conflict of interest.
The involvement of the Saudi royal family is an unexpected twist in the saga over the mysterious funds transfer and the troubles of indebted state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), whose advisory board Najib chairs.
"I am satisfied with the findings that the funds were not a form of graft or bribery," Attorney-General Mohamed Apandi Ali told a hastily called news conference.
Apandi said in a statement that $620 million was returned to the Saudi royal family in August 2013, about five months after the transfer, because it had not been utilized.
"There was no reason given as to why the donation was made to PM Najib, that is between him and the Saudi family," he said.
[...]
Amazingly the story gets even funnier as it goes along so I compliment the Reuters reporters, Rozanna Latiff and Emily Chow, for a maintaining a straight face throughout -- although they might not have had much choice as they were reporting from Kuala Lumpur. It won't do to be holding your sides with laughter while interviewing government officials in an emerging economy or for that matter any economy.  

But Malaysia, Malaysia -- why does that name ring a bell?  Oh yes, I was just reading about its problem with, uh, Salafist terrorism. Odd how these problems tend to crop up after a government gets a little too friendly with the Saudi government then decides it doesn't want to be that friendly. Maybe it's just me; maybe I'm reading too much into coincidence, and as we all know Al Saud is a great enemy of Islamic State and for that matter all terrorists.  

Not 6, but 7 terrorist attack plots foiled in Malaysia, say police
By MUZLIZA MUSTAFA
Published: 26 January 2016 - 4:25 PM [local time]
The Malaysian Insider

Police [have] so far had foiled seven terrorists attack plots planned by the local members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (Isis) in the country, Special Branch Counter-Terrorism Division said today. 

"It's not six, but seven. Of the total only one was in the third stage of planning while the rest were still in the initial stage," said the division's principal assistant director senior assistant commissioner Datuk Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay. 

In a seminar in Kuantan this morning, Ayob told more than 1,000 Pahang government officials that the latest case, seven people who were nabbed were planning to launch attacks at hotspots in several states in the country.

They were detained between January 22 and 24, including the cell head who worked as an assistant hotel manager in Johor. Ayob said those arrested were committed to their cause and had very strong ideology but lacked knowledge. 

"They wanted to carry out attacks because the Malaysian government is described as 'taghut' (not following proper Islamic teaching) and that who are against them are considered as pro-Shia and that they can be killed." 

The arrests of seven were follow-ups to the arrest of a 28-year-old former insurance agent from Terengganu on January 15 at a train station in Kuala Lumpur. The 28-year-old was detained with a knife and Isis propaganda material. It is understood that he was instructed to carry out an attack by stabbing civilians at [a] famous spot in the city centre. 

After getting information on the plan, the police detained the suspect. The arrest came a day after the deadly attack in Jakarta, Indonesia, which killed 12. 

Star Online reported yesterday that a Malay-speaking wing of Isis had sent a warning to Malaysia for stepping up its campaign against the terror group. In a strongly worded video posted in Bahasa Malaysia, the Malaysian-Indonesian unit of Isis, called the Katibah Nusantara, threatened revenge for the arrests of its members. 

Titled “Mesej Awam Kepada Malaysia” (Public Message for Malaysia), the video warned: “If you catch us, we will only increase in number but if you let us be, we will be closer to our goal of bringing back the rule of the 'Khalifah' (caliph). 

“Those who brand us as 'khawarij' (dissenters), Daesh [a derogatory name for Isis] and even as Mossad agents are in fact, Shia and its allies. We will never bow down to the democratic system of governance as we will only follow Allah’s rules.” 

Following the militant attack in Indonesia on January 14, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar announced that Malaysia’s alert status was at the highest level. Khalid said Malaysia was now on “alert to the highest degree”, as terrorism analysts said Isis was now spreading its operations beyond the Middle East and Europe to Asia. 

Khalid added that after the latest attacks in Jakarta, security measures were increased in public places in Malaysia, such as malls and tourist spots. He also said precautionary action would be implemented at border areas to prevent possible infiltration by terrorists.

[END REPORT]

********

The quest for truth is a better servant than defense of ideals

The Glittering Eye's Dave Schuler, in commenting on the departure from the blogosphere of an empirical thinker, wrote "It's getting lonely out here." 

I can't remember how many years ago that was, but I remember the chill that came over me when I read his words. Dave isn't given to histrionics.

I am remembering, too, my alarm when I learned that a man who might be the most incisive thinker writing for the blogosphere had turned his laser intellect to a blistering attack on Leftists that twisted facts. 

My first reaction was that someone had gotten to him, bought him. But when I went back through his writings I saw that his passion to defend the greatest of American ideals against what he saw as certain destruction by the Left had eventually caused him to weaponize his intellectual gift.     

Mark Steyn once observed that one by one the lights were going out all over the world. But he was talking about the quashing of public speech by governments and political factions that are clear enemies of the free exchange of ideas. The greater threat is from those who subvert truth to defend an ideal they consider noble.

It comes down to faith, faith that noble ideals are grounded in the quest for truth. It is on this faith that the whole of the empirical approach, the whole of scientific inquiry, is based. 
                 
Those who quote the adage "In the long run we're all dead" to defend lying as a means to persuade aren't thinking straight -- not in an era when the long run can be a year or two. 

Weaponizing the intellect in the service of ideals isn't like picking up a gun in self defense. You can put the gun down when you're finished shooting but you can't disengage so easily from a corrosive way of thinking that has become habitual. 

********

Monday, January 25

Latest on planned Geneva negotiations. Sigh.

U.N. seeks Syrian peace talks this week, opposition threatens boycott
BY LISA BARRINGTON AND TOM MILES 
January 25, 2016 - 1:41 PM EST
Reuters
BEIRUT/GENEVA 

********

Syria Sitrep at Sic Semper Tyrannis plus don't miss the video

SYRIA SITREP: Rebel Defences Crumbling In Latakia Province by Patrick BAHZAD, Jan 25, 2016. Sic Semper Tyrannis

In one sentence, the Syrian Army coalition is on a roll but be sure to pick up all the details. At the same time I was reading the sitrep I had one of my five eyes on Al-Masdar's breaking news ticker tape -- yes yes I know one isn't supposed to multi-task -- and so it happened that at the same time I was reading this passage from the sitrep:
To make things worse for the Salafi and Jihadi groups present in Latakia province, the Turkish border, which used to be as open to them as a saloon door (the PC slang being "porous") has now turned into their enemy, as the Turks have now closed it in parts, thus making it impossible for these groups to retreat towards their logistical rearbases and sanctuaries North of the border. No doubt, Erdogan is not keen on sheltering groups and individuals who might possibly turn against him, if they think they are not getting proper support. He may certainly be willing to help out his own proxy militias (mostly Turkmen groups and components of "Ahrar al-Sham"), but he knows of the dangers that the lose cannons of various Jihad franchises represent.
Paul Antonopoulos at Al-Masdar News was reporting:

Suicide attack on terrorist group in Aleppo
The Daily Star [I think that's in Beirut but don't quote me] has reported that a suicide bomber belonging to an unknown group drove [into?] a fuel tank, blowing himself up on Monday.  
[Update: Reuters report 12:41 EST described attack as "a suicide bomber driving a fuel tank truck"]
The target was a checkpoint belonging to the Islamist group Ahrar ash-Sham, who are allied with Al-Qaeda affiliates, Al-Nusra Front.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) reports that 7 members of the terrorist group died, in which 4 were commanders.
The SOHR also reported that three nearby buildings were destroyed and dozens of people were injured and stuck under rubble.
Seems like somebody really wanted to take out those commanders. I wonder if they were part of the "components" of Ahrar ash-Sham that Patrick wrote are a proxy for Erdogan's crew. Surely it's the same group despite the slightly different spellings.

Anyhow, that's four commanders who won't be showing up in Geneva for negotiations. If I recall Ahrar al-Sham was one of the groups Kerry had at least originally wanted represented and Moscow had nixed the choice. 

Before I sign off, I want to mention this report from FARS datelined today

Military Strategist: Syrian Army Readying to Free Besieged Shiite Towns in Aleppo

Makes a good companion read for Patrick's sitrep. Also, from this weekend, this dour headline from Associated Press: Russian-backed Syrian army advances imperil peace talks 
       
And this video from Al-Masdar News:

Al-Masdar Jan 24 SAA battling ISIS on Deir Ezzor Frontline (Video)

Incredible footage has captured the Syrian Arab Army’s battle with ISIS in recent days in Deir Ezzor.

The city is an enclave of government held territory completely surrounded by ISIS.

The defense of the city is led by renowned General Issam Zahreddine. The video shows the General leading his troops in an intense battle against the terrorists.

Despite early and initial successes by ISIS, all the gains made were overturned by the Syrian Arab Army.

* Warning: the video contains graphic footage*


[*Pundita Warning: the video contains music accompanying the action.* Sounds to me like a Russian technician got a little carried away]

********

UAE newspaper considers this news? It's rumor.

Al-Masdar News is excited about this report: 
Geneva talks will be 'catastrophe' for Syrian opposition
By Sami Moubayed, Correspondent
January 25, 2016 - 13:15
Gulf News
Moscow has convinced Washington to pressure the opposition to make major concessions ahead of talks
Beirut: The upcoming Geneva talks, slated for Thursday, [are] expected to be a catastrophe for Syria’s opposition. The talks, which were supposed to take place today, were delayed due to last-minute diplomatic wrangling.
US Secretary of State John Kerry who was in Riyadh over the weekend met with Riad Hijab, a senior figure in the Syrian opposition and former Prime Minister, as well as senior Gulf officials.
At the time, the US issued a vague statement saying that Saudi Arabia and the US had reached an “unspecified understanding” on Syria.
Sources speaking to Gulf News, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue, say that Kerry delivered a Russian ultimatum to the Saudi-backed Syrian opposition.
Hijab, who was named chairman of the Higher Negotiations Committee, was responsible for putting together a 15-person delegation for Geneva.
However, Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, vetoed the list saying participation of groups such as Jaish Al Islam and Ahrar Al Sham would not be accepted.   
Russia argues that these Saudi-backed groups are “terrorists”.
Kerry was apparently “won over” by his Russian counterpart during their meeting in Zurich, ahead of the GCC talks.
Stop right there. From RT, January 24, that being just yesterday. Emphasis mine:
Russia, US agree to have 2 rebel delegations at Syria peace talks - reports
Moscow and Washington are close to reaching a compromise on the participants of the Syria peace talks set to start next week. Two separate Syrian opposition delegations are expected to be invited to the negotiations in Geneva, according to media reports.
[...]
Washington supports the participation of the Saudi-backed Islamist militia Jaysh al-Islam (Army of Islam) - something Moscow has strongly objected to. Russia insists that political figures it deems more moderate, such as Qadri Jamil, a former Syrian deputy prime minister, and Saleh Muslim, co-head of the Syrian Kurdish group PYD, should join the negotiations, Kommersant daily reported Saturday.
A compromise has allegedly now been reached, however, with Moscow agreeing to the presence of Jaysh al-Islam at the talks. In return, Washington will not object to a separate Syrian opposition delegation being invited, Bloomberg reports, citing three Western and UN diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The ‘main’ opposition delegation was rubberstamped in the Saudi capital Riyadh in December, and represents opposition groups sponsored by Saudi Arabia and the West.
Staffan de Mistura, the UN special envoy for Syria, is now likely to send invitations to two opposition groups - one proposed by Washington, another recommended by Moscow.
“We are confident that with good initiative in the next day or so, those talks can get going,” US Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters on Saturday in Riyadh, where he has been seeking a deal on the Syria talks.
De Mistura is expected to elaborate on the latest details of the peace process at a press-briefing in Geneva on Monday, his spokeswoman Jessy Chahine said.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova made no comments in a press conference on Friday regarding which opposition groups will attend the talks in Geneva.
[...]
So it doesn't seem Lavrov changed Kerry's mind prior to Kerry's embassy to Riyadh. Has Kerry's mind changed in the last 15 minutes? That's possible but did the Gulf State reporter have a crystal ball? To return to the Gulf State report: 
According to sources, Kerry told Hijab that the opposition was going to Geneva III to negotiate the creation of a cabinet of national unity between them and the Syrian regime.
The opposition would not take over power in Damascus, the sources said, as participating parties set no date for President Bashar Al Assad’s exit.
Also, according to the US-Russia agreement, Al Assad would be entitled to run for a new term in the summer of 2017. [Pundita: this statement is supported by other reports
Hijab reportedly expressed deep “concern and surprise” at what he heard from Kerry.
This was a dramatic departure for the US and a major shift in the fortunes of the Syrian Opposition.
With no doubt, it is a major victory for Damascus and Moscow.
The opposition, after all, was expecting Geneva III to sign off on what was agreed upon at Geneva I in the summer of 2012, basically, a Transitional Government Body (TGB) that takes over full-powers from Al Assad and replaces him at the Presidential Palace in Damascus.
According to both Kerry and Lavrov, this won’t happen anymore but what the negotiations will produce is a cabinet of national unity between the opposition and Syrian officialdom, along with free parliamentary elections and a new constitution.  [Pundita: this statement is also supported by other reports although whether the negotiations will actually produce said cabinet is open to question]
As if these harsh realities were not enough, Kerry also bent to Russian pressure and agreed to add the names of three Moscow-backed opposition figures to the Syrian Opposition delegation. This had previously been refused by Hijab and his team but they were forced to accept under US pressure.
The three names are Saleh Al Muslim of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (whose name had strongly been vetoed previously by the Turks), ex-Prime Minister for Economic Affairs Qadri Jamil, and human rights lawyer Haitham Manaa.
All three men were purposely ignored at the Riyadh Conference.
Third on the list of setbacks for the Syrian Opposition was a joint US-Russian agreement that confidence building measures would take place as a result of the talks in Geneva, and not as a pre-condition.
Both sides assured Damascus that no preconditions would be made before the talks started this January.
The opposition had said that they would boycott Geneva unless there was a release of political prisoners, a halt to aerial bombardment of rebel-held villages and stop to sieges.
 [END REPORT]
All right; we'll just have to see what happens on Thursday.

********   ] 

Kerry as much admits U.S. still supporting terrorist groups in Syria

"The position of the United States is and hasn’t changed, that we are still supporting the opposition politically, financially and militarily."

-- U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in Vientiane, Laos, commenting today, January 25, on planned negotiations between the Syrian government and opposition forces, as reported by David Brunnstrom for Reuters 11:10am GMT, Kerry hopes for clarity on Syria talks within 24 to 48 hrs.

Kerry later added to the above statement, "We completely empowered them. [the opposition] I don't know where this is coming from." This according to an Associated Press report, filed today at 7:51am EST, Syria peace talks delayed, "the war does not end".

Kerry's statements back up one made by U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden in Istanbul, Turkey on January 23, as reported by David Dolan and Asli Kandemir for Reuters, 5:56pm EST; U.S. says prepared for military solution against Islamic State in Syria
Biden added that he discussed with Davutoglu how the two allies could try and work together to support Syrian rebel groups who oppose President Bashar Assad.
Yet Mr Biden and all members of the Obama Administration are well aware that Erdogan's Administration is deeply involved with Islamic State and other terrorist groups -- and that more evidence for this continues to surface. From a MEMRI report, January 15, 2016, More On The Turkey-ISIS Connection:
In recent months, further information about the AKP government's support for ISIS and other jihadis in Syria has come to light. Turkish journalists who have documented their government's support for terrorists and who have published evidence of truckloads of arms and ammunition, as well as fighters, being sent into Syria have been threatened, arrested, and imprisoned by Turkish authorities.[1] 
Foreign media have also extensively covered Turkey's sponsorship of ISIS and other terrorist organizations, and documented the ease with which thousands of foreign and Turkish jihadis enter and exit Syria under the eyes of Turkish officials.
However, Western governments have refrained from criticizing Turkey's conduct in this matter, and continue to call Turkey "a partner in the fight against terrorism."
Many in Turkey, including Mehves Evin, columnist for Turkish opposition dailyDiken, have asked, in light of this heavy media coverage of Turkey's sponsorship of jihadi terrorists, "Why isn't there a peep from the West?"[2]
The following report presents further evidence of the Turkish government's support and sponsorship of ISIS and other jihadi terrorist organizations:
[...]
It is the same with opposition groups that continue to fight in Syria; time and again they have been exposed as being terrorist, or closely allied with such groups, and/or so alike Islamic State or al Qaeda that they differ only in details or over territorial disputes.  

Yet John Kerry seems to be experiencing a North Vietnamese moment all over again with his insistence that Assad's Administration must work out compromises with opposition groups. 

If Mr Kerry is indeed drawing on his experience with the North Vietnamese, he is studiously overlooking that the situation bore no relation to the one in Syria. There are several opposition groups that the Assad Administration has no objection to negotiating with -- but these are ones that now refrain from taking up arms against the government, and they are actually Syrian not foreign fighters representing foreign governments or receiving their support.

*********

Thursday, January 21

I'll return on Monday

Till then, 
Best regards to all,
Pundita 

Outcome of Jan 20 Zurich meeting

Sergey, please don't be upset we're stabbing Russia in the back 


Reuters has a long-winded report on the meeting but it comes down this: The United States has staged a show called peace negotiations that works in favor of Saudi Arabia and its coalition, which wants to take control of Syria via proxy groups. Syria is a small price to pay, in the U.S. view, for improving relations with the disgruntled Saudis and their Gulf Arab partners. 

The United Nations is going along with the show, even though the U.N. Special Envoy to Syria, Staffan de Mistura, knows he's presiding over nothing more than a macabre farce unless the Saudi coalition is completely excluded from the peace negotiations -- and that can't happen because of U.S. support  for the coalition. 

What the United States has done is unconscionable. Knowing full well that many of the groups fighting the Syrian government differ from Islamic State and al Qaeda only in name and minor details. the U.S. agreed at the Zurich meeting that any truce worked out in negotiations between Assad's government and 'opposition' groups wouldn't apply to IS and Nusra, AQ's proxy in Syria. But then Kerry, working under orders from the White House, refused to agree to the exclusion of any other groups on the list Riyadh had presented. From RT's report; emphasis mine:
The negotiations will focus on such issues as the tasks of the transition period, preparation of the new constitution and early election, the FM said, adding that Russia, the US and other foreign players will only monitor the talks.
Lavrov was also asked whether Kerry and him had reached an agreement on the participation of the Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaish al-Islamin groups in the Syrian talks.
"We can say that there is no such agreement," the Russia's top diplomat replied.
Russia presented data on the terrorist nature of both groups to the US during the Zurich meeting, maintaining its stance that Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaish al-Islamin have no place at the negotiating table.
Ahrar ash-Sham “is known to have been repeatedly shelling residential quarters of Damascus and Russia's embassy. Ahrar ash-Sham is a child of Al-Qaeda," Lavrov explained.
However, the FM expressed confidence that UN Special Envoy on Syria, Staffan de Mistura, would be able to form a representative opposition delegation for the intra-Syrian negotiations.
As to the list of acceptable groups for the negotiation that was supposed to be finalized at the January 20 meeting between Kerry and Lavrov, it didn't happen. How, then, can the negotiations go forward, if there's no agreed-upon list of attendees at the meeting? From the Reuters report:
U.N. Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura spoke in an interview with broadcaster CNN, hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held talks in Zurich despite no sign of agreement on who should represent the opposition.
"We have no intentions to postpone the talks from January to February. This is both the position of Russia and the United States, and we are confident that in the next days, in January, such talks must start," Lavrov said.
"...This will be just the start, because of course it will take a lot of time, a whole range of arduous tasks are to be resolved."
Various dates were being mooted, but the final decision was for the U.N. Secretary General on the advice of de Mistura, he said.

De Mistura, asked if he was able to send the invitations to the talks, told CNN in the Swiss resort of Davos: "I can’t tell you today, I will tell you on the 24th, one day before."    
If none of this is making sense -- everything makes perfect sense when you are certain you're dealing with scoundrels. Moscow is certain about what it's dealing with. So is Damascus. 

Both know that Washington wants Syria blanketed with no-fly zones, to be accomplished by 'international humanitarian' organizations such as the International Red Cross delivering food aid to regions controlled by Nusra, IS, etc. That's why Washington, and Riyadh, want as many such groups included in the negotiations as possible: they know that part of the Assad goverment's agreement with opposition fighters is to deliver food aid to them once they stop fighting.  

In short, the entire negotiation show staged by the U.S. is a backdoor way of aiding the hardline Islamist groups such as Nusra and the rest of the alphabet soup survive another day in Syria.

Why, an American would ask; why should our government want to help the terrorists? Well, why should our government want the Afghan government to negotiate with the Taliban in Afghanistan? 

The same answer applies to both questions. It's because Washington doesn't want a military solution to Terror, Inc. and doesn't think one is possible.

A reporter for VOA told John Batchelor after the terrorist attack in Jakarta that 400 terrorists from Indonesia were fighting in Syria. A few weeks earlier a report at one of the Russian news sites mentioned that 400 fighters from Kyrgyzstan were on their way to Syria. The Syrian government has counted mercenaries from 100 countries fighting in Syria; the American government has counted 80.

So either shut down the bankrollers or keep trying to empty the ocean with a sieve, in the U.S. view. The U.S. and its Western partners don't want to shut down the bankrollers, so the alternative is pushing for 'political' compromises that work out to giving the hardliners and their bankrollers control of entire countries.   

The view of Damascus is that the hardliners can jolly well take their act somewhere else -- and that a military solution in this limited context is entirely possible. In short, the Syrian government isn't interested in keeping order in the entire world, just in their own patch.  

So what's going to happen next?  Same thing that's been happening since the Russians and Syrian military got up to speed. Damascus is cutting its own deals with opposition groups without help from the United States thank you very much -- deals made at the point of the government's gun. This is the thinning the forest, so the Russian and Syrian bombers have a better fix on the mercenaries.  

The Syrians and Russians will go along with America's show up to a point because in that way Damascus can always net a few more Syrian groups actually willing to lay down their weapons. Meanwhile the air campaigns and ground offensives grind on as in this example, reported yesterday by FARS: ISIL Raqqa-Aleppo Supply Route Cut in Syrian Air Attacks. 

And the capitulations continue as reported yesterday, again by FARS: 

ISIL, Al-Nusra Evacuating Southern Damascus

TEHRAN (FNA)- The al-Nusra Front and ISIL militants started leaving Southern Damascus under a deal with the Syrian government that was signed and was due to go into effect last month but came to a halt after Jeish al-Islam top commander Zahran Alouch was killed in a Syrian air raid.

The al-Nusra Front and ISIL terrorists are now evacuating the neighborhood of al-Hajar al-Aswad,Yarmouk refugee camp and al-Qadam regions on Wednesday.

Under the agreement between the Syrian government and militants, over 4,000 terrorists are due to leave the Southern parts of Damascus and the Palestinian refugee camp.

The websites of the Syrian opposition had quoted the terrorists stationed in Hajar al-Aswad and Yarmouk camp as saying that the militants coming from Yalda, Babila and Beit Saham districts have joined them and therefore, the grounds have been prepared for the evacuation of the ISIL militants.

The evacuation operations in these regions had been postponed some weeks ago after the Syrian Air force carried out airstrikes on gathering centers and command posts of terrorist groups in Eastern Ghouta in Damascus Countryside in December, killing Zahran Aloush, the leader of the so-called Jeish al-Islam terrorists group and a large number of senior commanders of al-Rahman brigade and Ahrar al-Sham.

Yarmouk is a camp for Palestinian refugees in the Southern parts of Damascus. The camp has been the scene of clashes among various terrorist groups and also crossfire between the militants and government troops for the last three years.

Ceasefire treaties to launch evacuation and relocation plans have started across Syria since the November.

In early December, militants began evacuating Homs city in Central Syria under a deal signed with the government in late November, known as the Al-Wa'ar Agreement.

Large convoys of retreating rebels left Homs City for Idlib in Northwestern Syria.

Al-Wa'ar was the only remaining base of the militants in the city of Homs.

[END REPORT]

But why cut deals with something like Islamic State? They're not exactly an opposition group. Damascus doesn't care what they say they are, as long as they give up all weapons except hand guns, stop fighting, and clear out of a particular region. As to what will happen to them later on, that depends entirely on them.   
                    
*******

Wednesday, January 20

U.S. charges at Islamic State with the battle cry, "We'll hold more meetings!"

7 Western defense chiefs gather to make a better battle plan against Islamic State


Summary of the improved battle plan: 

1. Female defense chiefs to wear brighter colors for the next meeting.
2. Look busy.
   
From the Deutsche Welle report on the meeting:
US Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Wednesday there was "broad agreement" on a plan to accelerate the campaign against IS over the next year, as defense officials said they had made progress pushing back the Sunni extremist group.
"We agreed that we all must do more," Carter said in Paris after meeting with the defense ministers of France, Australia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
The US plan envisions coordination among nations fighting IS and backing Iraqi security forces and Kurdish peshmerga to take Mosul in northern Iraq, while across the border working with Syrian Kurdish and moderate Arab forces to put pressure on IS' self-declared capital in Raqqa.
The US-led coalition must focus on "collapsing its two power centers in Raqqa and Mosul," Carter said.
The US defense chief added that defense ministers from Iraq and 26 nations in the anti-IS military campaign would meet in Brussels in three weeks.
The US is asking countries to increase their contribution to the campaign, including special forces, fighter and reconnaissance jets, drones, training and weapons and munitions. It's also calling on Gulf Arab states and other countries in the region to become more involved. ...
From the Washington Post report:
(Paris) The U.S.-led military coalition’s fight against the Islamic State militant group entered a new phase on Wednesday, with defense ministers from the seven countries most heavily involved in the operation pledging to continue fighting and look for ways to more aggressively target the group.
The United States, France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Australia and the Netherlands made the promise here after a joint meeting hosted by U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and his French counterpart, Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian. The group’s members said in a joint statement that they have “expressed our broad support for the campaign plan objectives, and the need to continue gathering momentum in our campaign.”
Navy Vice Adm. Mark I. Fox, the deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, briefed the defense ministers on what has been identified as needs, including more Special Operations troops, more training to help local forces counter improvised explosive devices and more training on how to build temporary bridges for military operations, said a senior U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the private meeting candidly.
“There was agreement that this is a good moment to do more,” the senior defense official said.
Separately, Carter announced during a news conference Wednesday alongside Le Drian at the French version of the Pentagon that he has invited leaders from all 26 nations involved in the military side of the campaign against the Islamic State, along with Iraq, to meet in three weeks in Brussels, the home of NATO.
The first-time meeting will be focused on how the war may be expanded to include more resources. That leaves out 37 other countries that are a part of the 63-member coalition in some way, but not contributing militarily.
"Every nation must come prepared to discuss further contributions,” Carter said of the countries invited to attend the meeting in Brussels.
The senior defense official described the planned meeting in Brussels as a “forcing function” that will move defense ministers toward assessing how their countries will participate in the fight against the Islamic State in the future.
In addition to the countries whose defense ministers met in Paris, ministers from countries like the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, who have participated in the air war against the militants in the past, will be invited. ...
********

Al-Masdar reporter survives encounter with wacky German police, now embedded with Iraqi military

Paul Antonopoulos reported today that the reporter has arrived safely in Baghdad after his strange encounter with German police, who seemed to have decided he was a terrorist because he was headed to Iraq, and is now embedded with Iraqi troops on the outskirts of Baghdad. The reporter sent this interesting news, which of course wasn't mentioned in the Western media:
... Shi’ite militia fighting in Syria and Iraq wished Iraq’s Christian minority, comprised mostly of Assyrians and Armenians, a Merry Christmas. The signs were put up over a month earlier in a square in the middle of Baghdad.
Here is a picture he sent of one of the signs, looking just a little worse for wear:


So now Al-Masdar News readers will be getting good reports on the action -- as soon as the reporter and his cameraperson get used to filing video reports while trying to keep up with the combat troops. When Paul writes "embedded," this is not embedding at the canteen. See the website for a video of the newly-arrived reporter striving to get in the swing of things.   

As for those German police -- sigh.

********

 

Taliban suicide bomber targets free speech in Kabul with attack on media personnel

Seven Kaboora Production Employees Killed In Kabul Blast
Wednesday, 20 January 2016 21:01
Last Updated on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 22:30
Written by TOLOnews.com

A suicide bomber detonated explosives on Wednesday evening targeting a civilian bus that was carrying over 30 staff from Kaboora Production, which is a sister entity to TOLO TV, Lemar TV, Arman FM, Arakozia FM and TOLOnews.

At least seven staff members were killed in the attack and 26 injured.

The official statement from TOLO TV states: "We condemn these terrorist attacks that kill innocent Afghans. We await for an update from security and government officials on the details of the attack."

The incident took place just after 5pm on the Darul Aman Road close to the Russian Embassy.

President Ashraf Ghani issued a statement immediately condemning the attack "in the strongest possible words".

CEO Abdullah Abdullah also condemned the attack and tweeted: "I strongly condemn the coward terrorist attack targeting personnel of Kaboora Production and TOLOnews in Kabul this evening."

Abdullah visited the victims of the deadly blast late Wednesday night.

He walked through wards at the Kabul Emergency Hospital and stopped and chatted to a few victims.

Once finished he spoke to TOLOnews and said that freedom of speech and freedom of the press are major achievements of Afghanistan over the past 14 years.

He said such attacks would not stop the people from speaking out.

The Taliban has claimed responsibility for the attack.

[END REPORT]

Oldest Christian monastery in Iraq destroyed by Islamic State

Associated Press Exclusive Report.

Obviously a raccoon in a previous existence





Thanks to Sputnik for the first video and much-needed laugh.

********

The dogs are still barking at Assad's caravan as it moves on

I'm looking at a Washington Post report filed yesterday by Liz Sly headlined Russian airstrikes are working in Syria — enough to put peace talks in doubt. Under different circumstances Liz's confusion about the meaning of a battle plan would be amusing, but an informed reader can only recoil in horror at this interpretation of events:
Peace talks scheduled to start in Geneva next week are already in doubt because of disputes between Russia and the United States, their chief sponsors, over who should be invited.

Russia and the Syrian government are objecting to a U.S.-backed list of opposition delegates drawn up in the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh last month that includes representatives of some of the main rebel groups, saying that they won’t negotiate with people they term “terrorists.”
Terrorists? The Post and American administration need to stop hiding behind the term. The groups favored by Al Saud at the Riyadh conference differ only in minor details from Islamic State in their views on government.      

Liz is also carrying water for the administration when she adds:
Russia is pushing instead for the inclusion of a group of government-approved opposition figures who have remained loyal to Assad and also of Syria’s Kurds, who are fighting a somewhat different war on their own behalf in northeastern Syria.
This omits the fact that opposition figures were never loyal to Assad and still aren't. That's why they're called opposition. It's just that several of them realized that destroying their country was a counterproductive way of opposing him. These are the opposition figures Assad approves of negotiating with, which demonstrates that he is sane.

But from Liz's report it's obvious the Obama administration is still feeling its way to the understanding that Riyadh's picks couldn't even govern a chicken coop and that the vast majority of Syrians don't want to be ruled by Saudi Arabia. Or Qatar. Or Turkey. Or UAE. Or Bahrain. Or the United States. Or Iran, for that matter. And they especially don't want their country balkanized. 

Which is to say the Obama administration has demonstrated time and again that it has no understanding whatsoever of Syria. The U.S. handing off the problem of Syria to the Saudis is as stupid as handing off the problem of Afghanistan to Pakistan's rulers. 

The solution to these problems is for Washington to acknowledge that it's not the American government's place to solve a problem it is incapable of comprehending let alone solving. 
          
********          

No tears for massacred Pakistani university students

Bill Roggio at Long War Journal reports:
Suicide team sent by Pakistani Taliban faction assaults university
A suicide assault team from a faction of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan launched an attack on a university in the country’s northwest today, killing more than 20 students and faculty before security forces intervened to end the siege. The attack was claimed by a dangerous Taliban commander who plotted the assault on a military school in Peshawar as well as an airbase near the same city over the past two years.
Four jihadists dressed in military uniforms and armed with AK-47 assault rifles and suicide vests attacked Bacha Khan University in the northwestern district of Charsadda earlier today, Dawn reported. The jihadists indiscriminately opened fire on students, teachers, and security guards alike. Pakistani security soliders and police deployed to the university and engaged the gunmen, killing all four before they could detonate their vest.
The attack was claimed by Khalifa Umar Mansour, the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan’s leader for Peshawar and Darra Adam Khel. According to Dawn, Mansour published a claim of responsibility on his Facebook page (the page is no longer available).
Mansour is best known for the brutal December 2014 attack on a military high school in Peshawar that killed more than 120 people, mostly students. He also is responsible for the September 2015 suicide assault on the Pakistani Air Force camp in Badabair. Mansour, who is also known as Umar Narey, has been featured in Taliban propaganda in the past.
The rest Bill could have copied and pasted from LWJ reports on earlier terrorist attacks in Pakistan. It's the same old story, differing only in minor details from all the other stories:
Khorasani’s criticism of Mansour is understandable as the assault on the Peshawar military academy in December 2014 brought the wrath of the Pakistan military down on the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan. 
The military, which pushed off US and Western requests to target jihadists based in North Waziristan for more than a decade, launched an operation in that tribal agency that targeted the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan and some allied group. 
But the military, despite claims to the contrary, did not target so-called “good Taliban” factions such as the Haqqani Network and the Hafiz Gul Bahadar Group. These two Taliban factions are considered by powerful military and intelligence factions to be assets to the Pakistan government as they serve as a bulwark against Indian influence in Afghanistan.
The Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan remains a potent threat to the government despite multiple military offensives against the group throughout the northwest since 2007. While the Pakistani military has targeted the group in different districts, the Pakistani Taliban moves to other areas and receives the support of the “good Taliban” factions to continue operations. 
Additionally, Pakistani Taliban fighters routinely slip across the border into lawless areas of eastern Afghanistan to escape limited military offensives.
But the 'good' Taliban are not only a bulwark against India. Pakistan's military simply wants to use them to help it rule Afghanistan.  

So after all the hell that Pakistanis have inflicted on Americans in Afghanistan and Afghans, and Indians, I'm supposed to feel sorry for murdered Pakistani children? Yes it's a tragedy but there have been so many tragedies, so many senseless deaths; so many children, so many innocents, cut down.

Yet Pakistan's rulers can't change; they are who they are -- fiends. The Saudis, long the sponsors of Pakistani actions in Afghanistan and against India, can't change. They are who they are -- fiends. The British government, long an aider of Pakistan's policies -- even against British troops in Afghanistan -- is so dependent on Al Saud there is little hope it can change. 

It's my government that can and must change. Stop supporting fiends, stop cooperating with them. Stop selling them weapons and giving their military training. 

I don't want to hear that everyone else is doing it. That's what everyone else says: The Americans are selling them weapons and giving them training, so we can do it. But stop and think: if everyone else is leaping off a cliff does that mean you have to?

As to the excuse that we have to keep helping Pakistan's military because if we don't al Qaeda will get hold of their nukes -- one fiend parts his hair on the left and another on the right. And they're worried about which hair part gets hold of nukes?   

Imbeciles. Do you realize I am surrounded by imbeciles here in Washington? Then people wonder: Why is she so often in such a bad mood?

******** 

Strange report about Facebook from Al-Masdar News

Facebook censors Syrian, Lebanese media pages in mass shutdown
January 20, 2015 -  1:00 am local time
Al-Masdar News
In a mass crackdown on Syrian and Lebanese journalism today, Facebook has closed down several news media pages, leaving their hundreds of thousands of followers confused and perturbed.
Among the pages shut down are the Syrian television stations SAMA TV, its sister channel Addounia TV, Syrian News Channel, Alikhabaria, as well as the Lebanese Al Mayadeen, based in Beirut and known as the ‘Al Jazeera of the Arab world’. Most of the pages were non-government organisations, privately owned and funded.
The sudden shutdown has been attributed by followers to ‘mass reports’ in which large groups of Facebook users with opposing views target the pages they want censored. Often these movements are run by ‘paid trolls’ who have been known to be funded by entities associated with governments or corporations.
In these cases, the reports are usually not related to violations of Facebook’s community standards. Instead their purpose is to suppress free speech as well as damage the organisations financially, as they rely on social media outlets for revenue.
Hundreds of thousands of people around the world who rely on these pages for breaking news have now been left in the dark.
[END REPORT] 
Maybe it's just strange to me because I'm not familiar with the way things work at Facebook; I don't belong to it and have only visited it a handful of times. What I don't understand is why the authors of the Facebook pages can't control trolls. Isn't there a way to filter comments before they're published at Facebook? Block undesirable ones, as can be done on other types of websites? Even the large news sites reserve the right to block comments.     

Granted, if the trolls are descending on the Facebook pages by the thousands daily, maybe the authors just don't have the capacity to review every comment, and so allow completely unrestricted access. 

Technical questions aside, from my glance at Google it seems that all the Facebook pages under attack named by Mikhail's report are either fair-minded about the Syrian government's prosecution of the war, or connected with the government. 

So there are plenty of suspects for the trolling attacks. If Mikhail's source(s) on this story are saying there is coordination between some paid-for trolls ("movements," as she termed it), the modus operandi reminds me of George Soros. He deployed a range of media campaigns during the "color"revolutions in Eastern Europe, and his work in those situations has always been rumored to have been overseen by the U.S. Department of State. 

Of course others can imitate the Soros media campaigns. And while he has overtly intervened in Syria (via one his foundations supporting the White Helmet organization, which gives medical attention to wounded opposition fighters), it doesn't mean he's bankrolling the trolling against the Syrian Facebook pages, or that he would be the only one doing this. Al Saud or Qatar would be top suspects. And the United States.

In the previous post I noted:
Now that the tide of battle in Syria has turned in favor of the Syrian government's coalition, the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are doing everything within their power to stop the Geneva III peace negotiations from going forward on January 25.
Because the trolling of the Syrian and Lebanese Facebook pages also hits at donations to the pages, this isn't only about flummoxing negotiations. But it does underscore that any and all means are being deployed to attack the Syrian government and its supporters. It also comes very close to cyber warfare, unless the cyber tecchies would say it's just that.

While on the topic of strange stories associated with the Syrian war, there is one directly connected to Al-Masdar News, a site that's obviously sympathetic to the Syrian government's prosecution of the war or at least fair-minded about it:
Al-Masdar journalist detained by German police
January 18, 2016 - 12:50 PM [local time]
Al-Masdar News
Moments ago, an Al-Masdar reporter who was set to fly to the Middle East was detained by German police and heavily interrogated during the process. However, he has since been released.
Remarkably, he was detained for more than two hours while the German police attempted to frame him for various criminal charges.
The reporter, who did not wish to be named for security reasons, was also accused of having fought for militant groups on his previous trips to Arab countries. The German interrogators said they believed his final destination was Baghdad.
The Al-Masdar reporter was only released from the locked interrogation room due to his connecting flight to Istanbul being ready for departure.
With the journalist set to arrive in the Middle East over the coming hours, given no further disruptions on his journey, ground reports from the region will continue to break on Al-Masdar News.
Well if they were trying to frame him, I doubt they would've let him go just because he wanted to catch a connecting flight. But it does seem the German authorities were bent on intimidating him.  

******** 

Tuesday, January 19

Mordor Update: The war within the Syrian War grinds on

"We used to produce five years ago around 400,000 barrels of oil; we consume inside Syria some and we export some. Now this oil is stolen by Daesh and sent to Turkey ... If these neighboring countries, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, implement the Security Council resolution to counter terrorism, 70 percent of our crisis will be finished and the 30 percent I promise you to end before the end of this year."
--  Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, January 15, 2016

United Nations Palace of Nations and grounds in Geneva, Switzerland


January 13, on the grounds of U.N. in Geneva

Pundita [chewing her cheese danish and shouting through her helmet mouthpiece to the Vogue reporter 1/2 click away] Incoming!

Vogue [to the U.N. waiter] I bribed you for a cheese danish? Go back in there and get me a brioche.  [to Pundita] What are you seeing?

Pundita:  I can't see anything. I'm behind a hedge. What are you seeing? 

Vogue:  I'm seeing either a giant bowl of vomit or a giant plastic globe filled with snakes.

Pundita:  That's the Armillary Sphere, also called the Celestial Sphere. It weighs about 1.300 pounds. One of the sculptures for the UN peace monuments. 
  
Vogue:  It looks like a bunch of snakes squished together or vomit.  

Pundita:  It was made sometime in the 1930s and installed in 1939 so maybe the sculptor was a little pessimistic about world peace. 

Vogue:  How old is the UN?

Pundita: This complex was built to house the League of Nations. 

Vogue:  How are we getting closer to the action?

Pundita:  We're going to pretend we're typical New Yorkers who got separated from our tour group.

Vogue:  Can I bring the cameraman?

Pundita.  Leave the cameraman. Take the brioche.

Inside the Palace of Nations
January 13 meeting between U.N. special envoy to Syria and 
ambassadors to the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council


The trilateral meeting between Russian, US and UN diplomats should stop Saudi attempts to influence talks that aim to draft the list of Syrian opposition, one of the leaders of Syria's opposition Popular Front for Change and Liberation told Sputnik Wednesday.
MOSCOW (Sputnik - January 13), Svetlana Alexandrova — The three-way meeting, which kicked off earlier on Wednesday, comes in preparation for a major intra-Syrian conference in Geneva on January 25 where opposition will meet with Syrian authorities.
"We expect that Russian, UN and US representatives will…put the gone-too-far Saudi Arabia in its place as it is trying to exceeded its authorities with respect to the process of forming a list of opposition," Qadri Jamil said.
Wednesday’s meeting in Geneva is expected to take further steps to implement the UN Security Council resolution on the Syrian crisis that calls to list Syrian opposition and terror groups, Jamil continued.
Several groups of Syrian external opposition met in the Saudi capital Riyadh last December despite protests from Damascus. They formed a council that hopes to handpick delegates to represent opposition at the upcoming talks with Syrian authorities.
Jamil accused the opposition that met in Riyadh of trying to monopolize influence and claim a monopoly when forming a united list of opposition.
Damascus said last month it did not recognize the Saudi-backed opposition, who demand that President Bashar Assad step down, and vowed to treat them as terrorists.
Now that the tide of battle in Syria has turned in favor of the Syrian government's coalition, the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are doing everything within their power to stop the Geneva III peace negotiations from going forward on January 25.

And if they can't halt or delay the negotiations, wreck them by every means at their disposal. One of the means has been to launch a propaganda blitz via media in countries where the governments are beholden to them that portrays Assad as engaging in a campaign to starve Syrians as part of siege warfare against places under the control of opposition fighters.

The claim is completely untrue but the United Nations, dependent on large donations from Al Saud and the Gulf Arab kingdoms in the Saudi coalition, has gone along -- despite the fact that the peace negotiations are led by the U.N.  And Western governments such as Germany and the U.K., trying to stay on the good side of the Gulf potentates and not wanting to rile Turkey -- the key transit point for migrants flowing into Europe -- have cooperated in spreading the propaganda.

The objective is to force a halt to the planned negotiations in Geneva between the Syrian government and opposition groups. This on the vaunted grounds that the humanitarian issue must be resolved before negotiations can go forward. However, there are no grounds -- a fact that Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister pointed out.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov enduring blasts of hot air 

GENEVA (Sputnik - Jan 14) – Linking the start of intra-Syria reconciliation talks with the delivery of humanitarian aid to Syrian cities is in violation of UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2254, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told journalists.
"We are not denying the importance of this problem and think that the population in need in Syrian settlements that are under siege must of course be provided with prompt humanitarian aid deliveries, but we believe that linking that to the start of [reconciliation] talks would be wrong and would be inconsistent with UNSC resolution 2254," Gatilov said on Wednesday.
Then there is the matter of the list:
The deputy foreign minister explained that the resolution stipulates the formation of a broad Syria opposition delegation prior to the start of reconciliation talks.
According to Gatilov, Russia has not yet seen the list of opposition groups to be included in the delegation that will take part in the January 25 talks and it is not clear if it will include any terrorist organizations, such as Jaysh al-Islam.
Al Saud formed the Riyadh coalition in December in a bid to take control of the all-important list of accepted opposition groups:
MOSCOW (Sputnik - Jan 16), Svetlana Alexandrova – Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry are set to meet in Zurich on Thursday, five days before the intra-Syria talks in Geneva.
"The opposition list has not been agreed yet. The issue will be discussed and, I believe, finally agreed at the January 20 meeting of Lavrov and Kerry. I think that the decision will be made that this list will consist of two groups – Riyadh-proposed opposition members and the second, which would be proposed by Moscow and Cairo,” the source said.
During the last round of international negotiations on the Syrian settlement on December 18, the sides failed to reach a consensus on what groups within Syria should be designated as terrorist and banned from the Geneva conference, where opposition representatives will meet with Syrian authorities.
On Wednesday, Russian, US and UN diplomats took part in a meeting in preparation for the January 25 meeting.
Moscow considers that forming a list of credible and moderate opposition representatives is a necessary condition for starting the intra-Syrian talks. Earlier this month, Lavrov said a sustainable settlement in Syria was impossible without an agreed single list of terrorist organizations operating in the country.
Several groups of Syrian external opposition met in the Saudi capital Riyadh in December despite protests from Damascus. They formed a council that hopes to handpick delegates to represent the opposition at the upcoming talks with Damascus representatives.
Vogue: I didn't hear anything about Saudi Arabia at that meeting. Where to next?

Pundita:  Zurich. January 20.
_______

Earlier Pundita dispatches from Mordor:

December 23, 2015

December 27, 2015

********