Translate

Monday, October 10

Clinton throws B'rer Trump into the briar patch

Didn't Clinton's campaign strategists tell her that the news media complex is Donald Trump's home? Whatever possessed her to give Trump an opening he'd been waiting for by digging up men's locker room trash talk from more than a decade ago and feeding it to the media? In a flash Trump turned the tables. 



(L-R) Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, Donald Trump, Kathy Shelton and Paula Jones at a press conference arranged by Trump in St. Louis, Missouri on Sunday.


Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathy Shelton sit in the audience before the debate

Those women had been waiting for decades to get some justice. They spoke to the media just before the second presidential debate, making it too late for the Clinton camp to lay down covering fire before the debate. 

The Daily Mail chronicled the ensuing carnage:
The debate night that will be discussed for generations in Political Science classes – and Women's Studies seminars – ended with Republican Donald Trump landing more punches than Democrat Hillary Clinton, and successfully deflecting attention from a two-day-old crisis about [his use of] graphic sexual language that threatened to derail his White House bid.
In the first debate at Hofstra University 13 days earlier, Clinton sat back and let Trump hang himself. But on Sunday her quiet patience gave him room to roam and dominate.
Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who has been among Trump's most forceful defenders, summed up the real estate tycoon's performance with two words in the post-debate spin room: 'home run.'
[...]
Giuliani wasn't making a partisan statement but a simple statement of fact.

Three of the women at Trump's presser also spoke to Breitbart's Aaron Klein on Sunday:

"We are ‘Terrified’ of Hillary - Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey"


********

Sunday, October 9

Thank you, Lord, for all you've done for me

Walter Hawkins and Donnie McClurkin singing "Thank You" in Azusa, California in 1993, at what seems to have been a week-long special celebration/Gospel music fest. You'll have to go directly to YouTube for this version but it's much worth it. 

Here is another version of "Thank You," this one from Walter Hawkins Love Center Choir. The lighting is poor in the church for the filming but it doesn't take away from the singing. From YouTube intro:
This is from their 1990 album "Love Alive IV". Soloist: Yvette Flunder. Guest Soloists: Rev. James Moore, Tramaine Hawkins, Frank Williams, and Thomas Whitfield


Goin' Up Yonder

I don't want to see any long faces this morning. C'mon, put your heart in it. Sing, dammit! Express a little gratitude for the gift of life. If you won't try to sing, at least clap along. If you won't clap, grab a spoon and a pot and bang along. Everyone can do that. Ready?

If you want to know where I'm going

where I'm going, soon 
If anybody asks you where I'm going
where I'm going, where I'm going soon
I'm going up yonder! I'm going up yonder!
I'm going up yonder to be with my Lord! 

I can take the pain, the heartaches they bring

The comfort's in knowing I'll soon be gone
As God gives me Grace I'll run this race
Until I see my Savior face to face!
I'm going up yonder! I'm going up yonder! 
I'm going up yonder to be with my Lord!


Walter Hawkins & Love Center Choir
Soloist: Tramaine Hawkins
1975


********

Saturday, October 8

US military: "It is primarily al-Qaeda that holds Aleppo"

There is currently a barrage of propaganda in the "western" media in support of "rebels" in east Aleppo. It is all about "hospitals" and "children" but the aim is to stop a Syrian army assault on the "rebel" held quarters of the city. U.S. officials are again talking about "intervention", meaning open war, to prevent the Syrian army and its allies from storming the "rebel" held eastern parts. It would not work but that is not the only reason why it is a strange idea.
"It is primarily al-Qaeda that holds Aleppo," said (vid) the spokesperson of the U.S. led 'Operation Inherent Resolve', Colonel Steve Warren. That was back in April and al-Qaeda (aka Jabat al-Nusra) has since strengthened its capacities in the city. The French Syria expert Fabrice Balanche tells Le Figaro (translated from French):
**[Al-Qaeda's] grip on Aleppo's east has only increased since the spring of 2016, when it sent 700 reinforcement fighters while moderate brigades fighters began to leave the area before the final exit was closed. The provisional opening of a breach of the siege of Aleppo in August 2016 (Battle of Ramousseh) has further increased its prestige and influence on the rebels.**
The UN Special Envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, told (vid, 27:43) the UN Security Council:
**We have seen information from other sources that tell us more than half of the fighters present in eastern Aleppo are al-Nusra. We have also seen reports alleging the intentional placement of firing positions close to social infrastructure, inside and aside civilian quarters.**
I'll interrupt MoA to point out that de Mistura's abacus doesn't seem to working well these days. The BBC (and other major press) reported on October 7:
Mr de Mistura said only about 900 of the estimated 8,000 fighters in eastern Aleppo were members of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham.
Granted, no one has an accurate count. But especially in light of his earler statement it's laughable to assert that less than a thousand fighters holed up in E. Aleppo are JFS aka Nusra Front aka al Qaeda. 

To return to MoA:
So why does the U.S. want to stop the Syrian government forces in their attempt to free the parts of the city which are undoubtedly held by al-Qaeda?
The U.S. voted "Yes" on several UN Security Council resolutions that demand to fight al-Qaeda and "to eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts of Syria."
Following the UNSC demand, Syria and its allies have surrounded the al-Qaeda held parts of east-Aleppo. They currently bomb targets of opportunity, take starting positions all around it and prepare to eventually storm and capture it.
Measures have been taken to allow civilians to escape from the area.
This whole operation is primarily in defense of west-Aleppo where 1.5 million civilians live under the protection of the government. Daily artillery strikes from al-Qaeda held east-Aleppo have killed and wounded many people in the government help parts. 
But some U.S. officials believe that defeating al-Qaeda in east-Aleppo will be useful for al-Qaeda:
**A U.S. official says Jabhat al-Nusra has been the “main beneficiary” (other than the Assad regime) of Russia’s onslaught. “Until Moscow stops bombing hospitals and aid workers, Nusra will continue to exploit the situation . . . and portray itself as the defender of the Syrian people,” the official explained.**
 "Hospitals and aid workers," are often unfortunate collateral damage in urban fighting. That will not surprise the U.S. military, especially after its bombing of several hospitals in Afghanistan and after it recently practically destroyed Kobani in Syria and Fallujah in Iraq to eradicate the Islamic State from those cities.
The claim that fighting al-Qaeda in Aleppo strengthens al-Qaeda seems dubious to me. But even if that is the case what is the alternative to fighting it in the city areas it holds?
U.S. Secretary of State Kerry is urging a new ceasefire with a pause in fighting and aerial bombing of at least seven days. State Department spokesperson Toner explained that yesterday. But he also admitted (vid @14:50) that al-Qaeda and other militant groups use such ceasefire periods to regroup and to resupply:
**... we can talk about that some rebel groups or opposition groups may have used the pause to resupply... **
 It is even more than that. Al-Qaeda wins in every ceasefire (even if those generally do not apply to it) in many other ways. A new study, specifically about al-Qaeda and ceasefire, details that and concludes:
**While the establishment of the truces was supposed to help to weaken the most radical factions of the insurgency, Jabhat al-Nusra emerged indisputably strengthened ...**
Another ceasefire would help al-Qaeda to resupply and regroup and to regain strength in east-Aleppo and elsewhere. Despite that and despite agreeing to the UNSC resolution the U.S. does not want the Syrian government and its allies to fight al-Qaeda in east-Aleppo because it believes that would strengthen al-Qaeda. It wants a new ceasefire. But any ceasefire or truce strengthens al-Qaeda.
Somehow the U.S. position does not compute.
It gets even more confusing:
[...]

"US Reviews Support to Saudi Coalition after Funeral Massacre Kills 200+ in Yemen" (UPDATED 11:00 AM EDT)

UPDATE
The death toll has been downgraded to anywhere between 80+ (a Houthi source) and 145, according to CNBC and other Western sources, while FARS is reporting 213 dead. From all reports I've seen, the wounded toll is at more than 500. 

Just about every major publication in the U.S. and abroad has by now done an in-depth report on the incident, which is having widespread ramifications. Here is the link to CNBC's report on the massacre. But I do want to include these passages from the FARS report that if accurate would call into question any Saudi attempt to portray the bombing of the civilian gathering as a mistake. (emphasis mine):
The airstrikes targeted a hall where people were paying their last respects to the father of Yemen's Interior Minister Jalal Al-Rouyshan who is also the chief of staff of former President Ali Abdullah Salih.
A second strike hit exactly the same region as people rushed to aid those injured in the first round of air assault. 
Also, the Saudi warplanes staged massive airstrikes on a ceremony on the house of Sheikh Abu Shwareb, inflicting tens of casualties on the civilians who had gathered for a ceremony at his residence.
The airstrikes killed at least 213 people, and wounded 534.
And CNBC notes:
Yemeni officials said the dead and wounded included military and security officials from the ranks of the Shiite Houthi rebels fighting the internationally recognized government of President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi and their allies, loyalists of former President Ali Abdullah Saleh.
Looks to me as if the Saudis couldn't resist such a target-rich gathering no matter how many civilians were present.   
*****
Review? Review? No first what you do is recall your ambassador and expel theirs. Then you start the review. And what does the White House think? That just telling Al Saud that U.S. security cooperation "isn't a blank check" is going to persuade them Washington is serious?  

And while we're at, why don't we also review our support for the United Kingdom? Also, France. And Belgium. What about U.A.E.? Why not also Qatar and Turkey? I'm not suggesting that removing American support for all those governments would solve the Islamist terrorist problem. But it would go a long way, eh? 

What a bunch of fiends we're involved with, but then fiends of a feather flock together. That includes my own government. [shivering] It's like living inside a horror movie. 
     
October 9, 2016
Sputnik

Saudi airstrikes targeting a funeral of opposition rebels horrified the world leaving over 200 dead forcing the United States to reconsider their position regarding aid and support to the coalition which has already been blasted by the United Nations for targeting hospitals, civilian infrastructure and children.

The United States has issued an "immediate review" of all aid to the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen after an airstrike killed over 200 people attending a funeral in Yemen. The Saudi coalition has come under fire in the past year even being included temporarily on the United Nation's "child killer" list for their indiscriminate bombing of hospitals, schools, and other civilian infrastructure that has led to mass loss of life among non-combatants. 


The White House called for an immediate ceasefire between the Saudi-led coalition and the Houthis in the wake of the attack with US officials describing the incident as "deeply disturbing" despite a string of similar incidents in recent months that have shocked the conscience of the international community. 

Among the similar-natured attacks was an airstrike on a peaceful protest of hundreds of thousands in the downtown square of the capital of Sanaa roughly one month earlier although that incident led to less loss of life with the bombs mostly careening just outside the protesters. 

The Obama administration has also pushed forward an unprecedented round of arm sales not only to Saudi Arabia, the single largest buyer of US advanced weaponry, but also to a number of other Gulf States include Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates — sales that have been met by scorn from some lawmakers and the international community with concerns that these weapons would be turned against civilians and even domestic populations. 

"In light of this and other recent incidents, we have initiated an immediate review of our already significantly reduced support to the Saudi-led Coalition and are preapred to adjust our support so as to better align with US principles, values, and interest said US National Security Council spokesman Ned Price. 

The National Security Council spokesman went further in admonishing Riyadh saying that "US security cooperation with Saudi Arabia is not a blank check."

[END REPORT]
*******

Did America's Secretary of State make up a story that Syria's military bombed a hospital?

That's only one possible explanation but the story is an eyebrow raiser. It's also very serious if Kerry did lie; it points to an attempt by the Obama Administration to gin up war crimes charges against both Syria's government and Russia's. In this report today Moon of Alabama's "b" analyzes Kerry's statement:


On September 28 the French mission to the UN claimed that two hospitals in east-Aleppo had been bombed. It documented this in a tweet with a picture of destroyed buildings in Gaza. The French later deleted that tweet.

It is not the first time such false claims and willful obfuscations were made by "western" officials. But usually they shy away from outright lies.

Not so the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. In a press event yesterday, before talks with the French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault about a new UN resolution, he said (vid @1:00) about Syria:
Last night, the regime attacked yet another hospital, and 20 people were killed and 100 people were wounded. And Russia and the regime owe the world more than an explanation about why they keep hitting hospitals and medical facilities and children and women. These are acts that beg for an appropriate investigation of war crimes. And those who commit these would and should be held accountable for these actions.
No opposition group has claimed that such an extremely grave event happened. None. No press agency has a record of it. The MI-6 disinformation outlet SOHR in Britain, which quite reliably notes every claimed casualty and is frequently cited in "western" media", has not said anything about such an event anywhere in Syria.

The grave incident Kerry claimed did not happen. Kerry made it up. (Was it supposed to happen, got canceled and Kerry missed the memo?) Kerry used the lie to call for war crime investigations and punishment. This in front of cameras, at an official event with a foreign guest in the context of a United Nations Security Council resolution.

This is grave. This is nearly as grave as Colin Powell's false claims of WMD in Iraq in front of the UN Security Council.

Early reports, like this one at CBSNEWS, repeat the Kerry claim:
Kerry said Syrian forces hit a hospital overnight, killing 20 people and wounding 100, describing what would be the latest strike by Moscow or its ally in Damascus on a civilian target.
But the New York Times write up of the event, which includes Kerry's demand for war crime investigations, does not mention the hospital bombing claim. Not at all. For the self-acclaimed "paper of record", Kerry's lie did not happen. Likewise the Washington Post which in its own write up makes no mention of the false Kerry claim.

The latest AP write-up by Matthew Lee also omits the lie. This is curious as Matt Lee is obviously aware of it. The State Departments daily press briefing yesterday had a whole section on it. Video (@3:30) shows that it is Matt who asks these questions:
QUESTION: Okay. On to Syria and the Secretary’s comments earlier this morning, one is: Do you know what strike he was talking about in his comments overnight on a hospital in Aleppo?
MR KIRBY: I think the Secretary’s referring actually to a strike that we saw happen yesterday on a field hospital in the Rif Dimashq Governorate. I’m not exactly positive that that’s what he was referring to, but I think he was referring to actually one that was --
QUESTION: Not one in Aleppo?
MR KIRBY: I believe it was – I think it was – I think he – my guess is – I’m guessing here that he was a bit mistaken on location and referring to one --
...
QUESTION: But you don’t have certainty, though?

MR KIRBY: I don’t. Best I got, best information I got, is that he was most likely referring to one yesterday in this governorate, but it could just be an honest mistake.
QUESTION: If we could – if we can nail that down with certainty what he was talking about --
MR KIRBY: I’ll do the best I can, Matt.
...
This goes on for a while. But there was no hospital attack in Rif Dimashq nor in Aleppo. Later on DoS spokesman Kirby basically admits that Kerry lied: "I can’t corroborate that."

It also turns out that Kerry has no evidence for any war crimes and no plausible way to initiate any official international procedure about such. And for what? To bully Russia? Fat chance, that would be a hopeless endeavor and Kerry should know that.

Kerry is desperate. He completely lost the plot on Syria. Russia is in the lead and will do whatever needs to be done. The Obama administration has, apart from starting a World War, no longer any way to significantly influence that.

Kerry is only one tool of the Obama administration. Later that day the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, made other accusations against Russia:
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian government  directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe,based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
Translation: "WE DO NOT KNOW at all ("we are confident", "we believe", "directed") who did these hacks and WE DO NOT HAVE the slightest evidence ("consistent with","based on the scope and sensitivity") that Russia is involved, so let me throw some chaff and try to bamboozle you all."

The former British ambassador Craig Murray calls it a blatant neocon lie. It was obviously the DNC that manipulated the U.S. election by, contrary to its mandate, promoting Clinton over Sanders. The hackers only proved that. It is also easy to see why these accusations are made now. Murray:
That the Obama administration has made a formal accusation of Russia based on no evidence is, on one level, astonishing. But it is motivated by desperation. WikiLeaks have already announced that they have a huge cache of other material relating to Hillary’s shenanigans. The White House is simply seeking to discredit it in advance by a completely false association with Russian intelligence.
The Obama administration is losing it. On Syria as well as on the election it can no longer assert its will. Trump, despite all dirty boy's club talk he may do, has a significant chance to catch the presidency. He (-44%) and Clinton (-41%) are more disliked by the U.S electorate, than Putin (-38%). Any solution in Syria will be more in Russia's than the Washington's favor.

Such desperation can be dangerous. Kerry is gasping at straws when he lies about Russia. The president and his colleagues at the Pentagon and the CIA have more kinetic means to express themselves. Could they order up something really stupid?

[END]

Now what would "something really stupid" look like? MoA's b has one idea: Syria - Is The U.S. Preparing A "False Flag" Bombing? replete with photos.  sigh.

********


"Islamists beat liberals in Morocco elections"

To make life easier for the illiterate, who make up a third of Morocco's population, the 30 parties in contention were marked on ballot papers with symbols such as a tractor or camel.

October 8, 2016
AFP

Rabat (AFP) - The Islamist party which has headed Morocco's coalition government since Arab Spring-inspired protests five years ago has beaten liberal rivals in parliamentary elections, results showed Saturday.

Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane's Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD) took 125 seats out of 395, the interior ministry said after all ballots were counted.

Its main rival, the Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM), which had campaigned against the "Islamisation" of Moroccan society, won 102 seats, the ministry said.

Istiqlal, the party which historically fought for independence from France, came third with 45 seats.

In any case, the real power will remain in the hands of King Mohammed VI, the scion of a monarchy that has ruled the North African country for 350 years.

Interior Minister Mohamed Hassad said that the election was "transparent" and had gone well, rejecting accusations of voter fraud from both sides.

The PJD had earlier issued a statement saying it was "very concerned about numerous reports of fraud being carried out by authorities" in favour of the PAM, and called on the interior ministry to "urgently intervene".

PAM spokesman Khalid Adennoun declined to comment but said that his party had filed "50 complaints" of voting irregularities, some concerning the PJD in Tangiers.

An Islamist candidate was attacked and wounded outside a polling station in Rabat, according to local media.

A video shared on social networks also showed a man stuffing a ballot box, leading the PJD to file a complaint, media reported.

Participation was at 43 percent, or roughly 6,750,000 voters, Hassad told a press conference in the capital Rabat.

Early turnout had been low in Rabat with many people waiting until after the weekly noon prayers to cast their ballots while others trickled to the polls after office hours.

- Scandals -

Meriem, a voter in her 40s, said after casting her ballot in central Rabat: "I came to carry out my duty as a citizen. Our Morocco needs a healthy democracy."

To make life easier for the illiterate, who make up a third of Morocco's population, the 30 parties in contention were marked on ballot papers with symbols such as a tractor or camel.

The PJD came to power in 2011, months after massive street protests prompted concessions from the monarchy.

A new constitution transferred some of the king's powers to parliament, at a time when autocratic regimes were falling in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.

While in government, the PJD passed a controversial reform of the retirement system and followed a relatively liberal economic policy.

Its task has been complicated by the unstable world economy and a drought this year that hit Morocco's vital agricultural sector and sent growth plummeting.

The party has been weakened by rising unemployment and what critics say is a failure to make good on promises in 2011 to tackle corruption.

It has also faced a string of scandals within its ranks including a drugs bust, a land-grab deal and the suspension of two vice presidents found in a "sexual position" on a beach.

The opposition PAM, formed in 2008 by a close adviser to the king, had hoped to take advantage in the polls.

Headed by Ilyas El Omari, it has poured enormous resources into a campaign criticising the government's economic record as "catastrophic" and pledging to roll back the "Islamisation" of society.

Several parties fielded ultra-conservative Salafists, in a sign that Islamists are becoming a feature of Moroccan politics.

The PJD and the PAM have ruled out joining forces in a grand coalition.

Under the 2011 constitution, the king appoints a prime minister from the biggest party in parliament once the election results have been announced.

[END REPORT]
********

Listen

Long, long, long before neo-Sufi fusion music emerged in Jordan; long, long, long before Latin, jazz and rock musicians showed up in Senegal to create mbalax Afro fusion music, diaspora and invader populations from the Middle East and North Africa were merging their musical traditions with those they found in Mediterranean and Central/South Asian regions. Here, selections from Sephardic Jewish music and Pakistani Sufi music. Notice similarities?      







U.S. coalition has bombed 13 bridges in Deir Ezzor, to the benefit of terrorists

It's no use my making a comment. What can I say? My government is a sponsor of terrorists, have a nice day. But the head of Deir Ezzor (spelled maybe 100 different ways) province had plenty to say:

TEHRAN (FNA - October 8, 2016)- Governor-General of Deir Ezzur Mohammad Qadour al-Aynia expressed regret that the US-led coalition is bombing Euphrates bridges to the benefit of the terrorists in his province.

"The US-led coalition recently pounded 13 bridges over Euphrates river from al-Bu Kamal region to the borders of Raqqa under the pretext of cutting the ISIL's supply routes but destruction of these bridges was aimed at annihilation of Syria's infrastructures and the Deir Ezzur people would face more hardship for commuting between the villages on the two sides of the river," al-Aynia told FNA on Saturday.

He said that the ISIL now takes a lot of money from the Deir Ezzur villagers to transfer them with boats, adding that the US created a new source of revenue for the terrorists.

The US-led coalition fighter jets once again conducted air raids over Deir Ezzur province on Friday, destroying another key bridge in the North of the provincial capital.

The US-led Coalition aircraft targeted al-Syasia Bridge in the city of Deir Ezzur on Friday which resulted in the destruction of the largest bridge in the province.

Last Monday, local sources in Deir Ezzur said the US airstrikes had destroyed more bridges and supply routes in the province, adding that 50 civilians were killed in the attacks.

"50 civilians, including women and children, were killed in the US-led coalition airstrikes on Deir Ezzur," the sources said.

A number of bridges have been destroyed by the bombers of the US-led Coalition in Deir Ezzur province in recent weeks, which, according to prominent analysts and politicians, is the Washington strategy to prevent the Syrian Army and its allies' further advances in the fight against the ISIL terrorists.

Local sources in Deir Ezzur said last Sunday that the US planes pounded 7 bridges in the past four days.

The bridges on the Euphrates in al-Mayadeen, al-Bu Kamal, al-Ashara, al-Basira, al-Tarif and al-Nowam in the Eastern and Western countryside of Deir Ezzur were attacked before the airstrike on al-Abbas bridge on Sunday.

The US-led Coalition's airstrikes had also destroyed al-Shihan Bridge near al-Salhin neighborhood in al-Bokamal countryside and Tarif Bridge in the Western countryside of Deir Ezzur that extends between Deir Ezzur and Raqqa provinces late September.

The bombers had also destroyed al-Asharah Bridge that links the two banks of the Euphrates River in the Eastern part of the Deir Ezzur province, only few hours after demolishing al-Mayadin Bridge in the same month.

The warplanes of US-led coalition targeted the Syrian army troops near the city of Deir Ezzur on September 17, leaving over 90 military personnel dead and a hundred wounded.

Russia’s Defense Ministry confirmed a report by the Syrian state news agency that an ISIL offensive began right after Syrian Army positions were hit by the bombers of the US-led coalition.

The actions of the coalition “clearly paved the way for ISIL terrorists to attack the position and take control of it,” the agency said citing the General Command of the Army and Armed Forces.

The General Command called the bombing a “serious and blatant aggression” against Syrian forces, and said it was "conclusive evidence" that the US and its allies support ISIL terrorist group.

A day later, a military source disclosed that the ISIL launched attacks on the Syrian army positions in Deir Ezzur only 7 minutes after the US-led coalition's airstrikes.

The military source reiterated that the air and ground assault were highly coordinated.

A Syrian top official said the country's intelligence unit possesses an audio recording of a conversation between the ISIL group and the US military before the airstrikes by the US-led coalition on the Syrian army troops near Deir Ezzur on September 17.

The speaker of the People's Council of Syria, Hadiya Khalaf Abbas, said that after the US coalition's airstrikes on the government troops, US military directed terrorists' attack on the Syrian army.

********

Islamic State uses MANPAD to fire at Russian chopper delivering aid supplies in Syria

Russian Helicopter Delivering Aid to Syria's Hama Attacked by Daesh Militants
16:01 - 08.10.2016 (updated 16:27 - 08.10.2016)

Sputnik

A Russian transport Mil Mi-8 helicopter on route to deliver humanitarian aid in Syria's Hama province came under fire from Daesh (Islamic State /ISIL) man-portable air-defense systems (MANPAD) on Saturday, the Russian center for Syrian reconciliation at the Hmeymim airbase said in a statement.

"Due to the high altitude, early launch detection and the crew's skill in maneuvering, the missile was dodged. Nobody on board of the helicopter was injured," the statement read.

The Daesh militants reportedly received two MANPADS from Iraq on October 6 to ensure the air defense of militants fighting the government forces trying to take control of the road from Hama to Aleppo.

[END REPORT]
********


Suspected planned bomb attack in Chemnitz, Germany (UPDATED 8:45, 9:35, 11:20 am EDT)

UPDATE 11:20 AM

The Independent (U.K.) has the latest details:

Chemnitz bombing plot: German city on lockdown as armed police launch operation against planned terror attack

Suspect on loose as police investigate preparations for bombing

UPDATE 9:32am

Finally one of the Russian news sites, RT, has picked up on the story. If as I'd guessed earlier the German govenment had been trying to keep a lid on the story, it's blown off: 

Manhunt for Chemnitz ‘bomb plot’ suspect: German police looking for 22-yo Syrian

UPDATE 8:45am

The (U.K.) Daily Mirror has more on the incident than the following CNN report, which quickly disappeared from Google News front page. Strangely the incident isn't reported at RT or Sputnik, both of which are usually on top of stories about a suspected terrorist plot against a European city.  Ta
king a guess I'd say the German government wants to downplay the situation. 

But from the Mirror report, the threat is quite serious because the tip was that the bombing attack was planned against an airport, and the suspected bomber is still on the loose.

****

Chemnitz: Major police operation ongoing in German city
By Laura Goehler and Laura Smith-Spark, CNN
Updated 8:13 AM ET, Sat October 8, 2016

CNN

(CNN)Officers are carrying out a major operation in the German city of Chemnitz "because of the suspicion of a planned bomb attack," Saxony police said on Saturday.
No suspect has yet been detained, police said. An explosion heard at the scene "was a protective measure taken by the police," the police force said via Twitter, as it warned people in the area to stay indoors.
[...]
********

Friday, October 7

MENA: THIS PROPERTY IS CONDEMNED


Earlier today I posted an Al Jazeera report that listed Iraq and parts of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran as suffering from an extreme heat wave this summer and an AP report that discussed Tunisia's water crisis. But buried in a wonkish journal is so much bad news about the water situation in other parts of the Middle East and North Africa it's hard to wrap one's mind around it. 

That might help explain why the author of the report, a Moroccan professor of cultural studies, seems incapable of facing reality. The king of his country just made history by draining all the water out of two French villages to serve his vacation estate and entourage. Before that, his majesty had led his nation in prayers for rain as his response to a catastrophic drought in Morocco.  

The solutions proffered by the author ignore that implementing them with any success would require behavior changes on the part of the people in the MENA regions.

To say that one can't expect human nature to make these changes quickly or easily -- if one is to make exceptions for human nature, then one must also make exception for its unwillingness to be destroyed by the human locust syndrome.              
Watering the Middle East
By Moha Ennaji *
September 15, 2016
Project Syndicate

* Moha Ennaji is President of the South North Center for Intercultural Dialogue and Migration Studies in Morocco and Professor of Cultural Studies at Fez University [Morocco]. His most recent books include New Horizons of Muslim Diaspora in North America and Europe and Muslim Moroccan Migrants in Europe.

(FEZ, MOROCCO) – The United Nations World Water Development Report confirms what many already know: hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) – especially in Algeria, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen – have faced the worst water shortages in decades in 2016. This is the last thing the region needs, as it works toward economic growth and diversification.

Multiple factors have contributed to the current situation, including climate change, desertification, water pollution, and misuse of natural resources. Inadequate information, education, and communication exacerbate many of these challenges, as it reinforces a lack of awareness of – much less commitment to – environmentally friendly practices. Add to that inadequate disaster-risk reduction and management by governments – many of which are dealing with other conflicts and crises – and the situation has become truly dire.

Algeria, for example, has been experiencing its worst drought in five decades. With much of the country’s agriculture relying heavily on rainfall, owing to underdeveloped infrastructure, cereal yields are down 40% this year. Despite its vast oil and gas wealth, Algeria has failed to ensure sufficient affordable water resources for its population, not to mention adequate employment opportunities. As a result, the country is now being rocked by popular protests.

Libya has faced even greater instability, wrought by years of internal conflict. The resultant power cuts and fuel scarcity undermined water distribution in the country. Last summer, the UN had to procure some five million liters of water from neighboring countries to meet the country’s needs.

In Jordan, water shortages occur with devastating frequency, particularly in larger cities like Amman. Jordan is estimated to have enough water reserves to support two million people. Yet its population is more than six million, not including the 1.5 million Syrian refugees who currently reside in the country.

In times of shortage, it is the refugees who are likely to be among the first to feel the effects. Water supplies in many refugee camps, in both Jordan and Lebanon, have been cut to a minimum – a decision that affects millions of people who are already enduring scorching temperatures. At Rukban, a refugee camp on Jordan’s joint border with Syria and Iraq, more than 85,500 residents each receive barely five liters per day for cooking, drinking, and washing.

The situation in Yemen is similarly grim. Racked by sectarian violence and civil war, the country has no functioning government to manage water resources. The capital, Sanaa, could run dry in ten years. And, with half of Yemen’s population lacking access to clean water, crops are failing and disease is spreading. The UN estimates that 14,000 children under the age of five die of malnutrition and diarrhea each year. Meanwhile, farmers are drilling deeper than ever for water – some wells are 500 meters deep – without any regulation.

Effective government intervention may be a long way off in Yemen, but it is feasible – indeed, imperative – in other MENA countries. For starters, national governments must work to modernize agricultural practices, including by training farmers and introducing more efficient irrigation tools. Reducing farmers’ dependence on rainfall is essential.

Some countries – namely, Morocco and Jordan – have already taken some important steps in this direction. Morocco’s government, in particular, has made substantial efforts to develop its water resources, including through dam-building.

But there is a still a long way to go. Water-distribution efficiency in Morocco remains low – just 60% for irrigation. For a country that has experienced more than 20 droughts in 35 years, that is a serious problem. The good news is that the African Development Bank recently approved a loan of more than €88 million ($98.7 million) to fund a project aimed at improving the quality of water distribution.

This points to a crucial insight: no one country can do it alone. Regional and international cooperation is badly needed. MENA countries must support one another in implementing programs modeled on what has worked elsewhere.

Moreover, additional investment – financed from domestic and international sources – should be allocated to repairing aging water infrastructure, as well as new projects, such as well-designed dams and water reservoirs. And stronger efforts must be made to safeguard existing water resources.

Here, the public has an important role to play. But citizens first must be made aware not only of how to use water more sensibly, but also of how to protect against climate-related disaster risk.

For the private sector and NGOs, upgrading water management in the MENA region presents a major opportunity to invest in water-services delivery and related technology. The regional market for enhanced local sanitation and water-related services is estimated to be worth over $200 billion. Projects aimed at meeting this demand are a smart investment.

But it is up to governments to take the first steps. If they do not take action to preserve water reserves and standardize supply, the most defenseless populations will continue to suffer, a situation that can easily lead to unrest – or worse. Indeed, if nothing is done to address the water challenges facing the MENA region, those challenges may fuel future wars.

At the next meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, to be held in Morocco in November, water should be at the top of the agenda. Given that more than 80% of the national contributions to the fight against climate change from the countries of the global South focus on water challenges, coordinated action by governments and international actors can no longer be postponed.

[END REPORT]
********  

Tunisia: "We are thirsty. Give us water. We don't need work, just water."

I might have already linked to the following Associated Press report but I don't want to take time to search for it on my blog and at any rate the report could bear repeating. 

I also can't remember (this damn war in Syria) whether I mentioned in August that the record-breaking heat wave that struck wide swaths of the Middle East last year was repeated this summer. This year's heat wave seems to have broken last year's records or come close. 

Here's Al Jazeera's August 29 report on the heat wave, which roasted Baghdad and Basra with temperatures close to 50 C. (122 F).  This was a wet heat, not like the bone-dry heat in say, Death Valley. I can remember as a child playing in the desert near Tuscon, Arizona where temperatures must have been close to 100 F, and not thinking anything of it. There was no humidity.    
[...]

The extreme temperatures have also reached parts of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iran but its greatest impact is being felt in Iraq.
The ongoing turmoil in the country has left tens of thousands of people displaced. Many are living in temporary accommodation where lack of air conditioning and intermittent electricity supplies means having to endure temperatures well in excess of what is normal in the the late summers.
There has been a marked increase in the number of people admitted into hospitals suffering from heat exhaustion and dehydration.
Farmers have reported that crops are also suffering due to the high temperatures and lack of water for irrigation purpose.
Economists estimate that the country's GDP has shrunk by 20 to 30 percent during this period.
[...]
What's going to happen if the trend continues next summer in the same places? Well, we'll think about that next year. 
  
'We are thirsty' say Tunisians as drought creates tensions
El Alem reporting from Sbikha, Bkalta and Mateur, Tunisia.
Published September 24, 2016 
Associated Press

Struggling with extremism and economic woes, Tunisia now faces another menace: persistent drought across several regions that is creating new social tensions and threatening farming, a pillar of the economy.

Farmland is too parched to cultivate crops and rural protesters have tried disrupting water supplies to the capital, while one legislator is calling for a "thirst revolt."
A lack of rain, combined with years of bad resource management, has left reservoirs and dams at exceptionally low levels that could lead to a "catastrophic situation," said Saad Seddik, who was agriculture minister until last month.
With municipal water supplies periodically cut off, residents of some towns are walking several kilometers (miles) to fetch water from public fountains, loading up donkeys with water canisters — if there's any left.
"We come here twice a day, first early in the morning before the dam becomes agitated and dangerous. But what we fetch in the morning isn't enough. So we repeat the trip in the afternoon," but it's still not enough to clean the house or wash clothes, said Hadiya Farhani from the town of Sbikha in the central Kairouan region.
Fellow resident Samir Farhani says the government is concentrating on fighting terrorism "while forgetting that thirst could make us turn into terrorists." Tunisia suffered two major Islamic extremist attacks last year targeting tourists and sees sporadic violence and threats from the Islamic State group in Libya and other radical groups in the region.
"We are thirsty. Give us water, we don't need work, just water," he pleaded.
Tunisia has had a string of governments since its Arab Spring revolution in 2011 that have concentrated on fighting extremism and corruption and building a democracy after years of autocracy.
Construction is under way on nine new reservoirs and three desalination plants, but water resource management has not been a top government priority. One recent government response: The minister of religious affairs asked imams to hold prayers for rain.
Most of Tunisia's water goes to farming, and drought-related agricultural losses are estimated at 2 billion dinars ($905 million) this year, according to the Tunisian Agriculture and Fishing Union. The grain industry alone is expected to lose 793 million dinars ($359 million) for the 2015/2016 season, it said.
Debts are piling up, and water reserves are down nearly a third from recent historical levels, according to the union.
A tomato and potato farmer in Bkalta in the Monastir region, Anis Zouita, normally plants this time of year but fears he won't be able to irrigate. That could lead to a shortage of produce and higher prices for consumers.
"We are stuck. We need water for this agricultural season," he said.
He says climate change, and the lack of a long-term government water strategy for this arid country on the edge of the Sahara, are to blame. Prolonged droughts are among many extreme weather phenomena that climate scientists say are becoming more frequent because of man-made carbon dioxide pollution.
The World Bank warned in 2009 that Tunisia was among countries in the region facing water resource risks. Tunisia has long had water issues, but what's unusual this time is that regions across the country, from north to south, are being hit.
The drought is also worsening social tensions, already simmering because of chronic unemployment.
The town of Fernana has seen weeks of unrest since a young man set himself on fire in desperation — mirroring a similar act in 2010 that unleashed the Arab Spring protests that overthrew Tunisia's president. This time, the Fernana protesters took out their anger at the establishment by converging on nearby dams and briefly cutting off water supplies to the capital, Tunis.
In another town, Mateur, 70 kilometers (42 miles) from Tunis, protesters angry over a lack of water blocked a road for two days earlier this month and burned tires. Police cleared their roadblock, but water cutoffs continue.
Lawmaker Faycal Tebbini, head of the Farmers' Voice political party, accuses national authorities of mismanaging the country's water supplies and wants a "thirst revolt." He says about 5 billion cubic meters of water flow into the sea every year that could be diverted for farming and residential use, and that 30 percent of water in reservoirs is lost because of leaks in damaged pipes.
He and other rural residents say government attention and water supplies are focused too heavily on richer areas such as the capital and tourist resorts along the Mediterranean coast, while leaving the interior — and its farms that feed Tunisians — parched.
"How can you explain that the Jendouba region, which has large reservoirs, is suffering from thirst? So badly that the No. 1 request from the region's residents is to have a mouthful of water to drink," he said.
[END REPORT]
********

Thursday, October 6

"Russian MoD warns US-led coalition not to strike Syrian army." Here we go, folks

Start a panic, expect the consequences. [shrugging] Well, we'll all meet again someday. But if you're a praying sort I'd say now's the time to pray for the American government to come to its senses about Syria and Russia because from everything I know, the Russians are not playing. They believe the Americans and NATO have pushed their backs to the wall. So they're not bluffing. You want nuclear war, you got it. Understand?       

"S-300, S-400 air defenses in place": Russian MoD warns US-led coalition not to strike Syrian army
Published time: 6 Oct, 2016 - 13:22 Edited time: 15:48
RT

Russia’s Defense Ministry has cautioned the US-led coalition of carrying out airstrikes on Syrian army positions, adding in Syria there are numerous S-300 and S-400 air defense systems up and running.

Russia currently has S-400 and S-300 air-defense systems deployed to protect its troops stationed at the Tartus naval supply base and the Khmeimim airbase. The radius of the weapons reach may be “a surprise” to all unidentified flying objects, Russian Defense Ministry spokesperson General Igor Konashenkov said.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, any airstrike or missile hitting targets in territory controlled by the Syrian government would put Russian personnel in danger.

The defense official said that members of the Russian Reconciliation Center in Syria are working “on the ground” delivering aid and communicating with a large number of communities in Syria.

“Therefore, any missile or air strikes on the territory controlled by the Syrian government will create a clear threat to Russian servicemen.”

“Russian air defense system crews are unlikely to have time to determine in a ‘straight line’ the exact flight paths of missiles and then who the warheads belong to. And all the illusions of amateurs about the existence of ‘invisible’ jets will face a disappointing reality,” Konashenkov added.


He also noted that Syria itself has S-200 as well as BUK systems, and their technical capabilities have been updated over the past year.

The Russian Defense Ministry’s statement came in response to what it called “leaks” in the Western media alleging that Washington is considering launching airstrikes against Syrian government forces.

“Of particular concern is information that the initiators of such provocations are representatives of the CIA and the Pentagon, who in September reported to the [US] President on the alleged controllability of ‘opposition’ fighters, but today are lobbying for ‘kinetic’ scenarios in Syria,” he said.

He cautioned Washington to conduct a “thorough calculation of the possible consequences of such plans.”

US-led coalition jets bombed positions of the Syrian government forces on September 17, resulting in the deaths of 83 servicemen. Washington said the airstrike was a mistake, however Damascus claimed the incident was a “blatant aggression.”

The relocation of the S-300 system in order to protect Russian ships and the naval base in Syria was confirmed by Russian defense officials on October 4. Konashenkov assured that the S-300 is a “purely defensive system and poses no threat.” Russia also has S-400 missile defense systems at Khmeimim base that were placed there after Turkey downed a Russian SU-24 jet in November of 2015.


[END REPORT]

********

"Syrian government forces seize half of rebel-held neighborhood in Aleppo: monitor"

By John Davison
October 16. 2016 - 11:41 AM EDT
Reuters

Syrian government forces seized around half of a key opposition-held neighborhood in Aleppo on Thursday in a new advance against rebels, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said.

The British-based Observatory said fighting had been raging in the residential Bustan al-Basha quarter near the city center, one of the frontlines in Aleppo which has been divided for years between government and opposition areas of control.

The Syrian military also said in a statement that its forces had advanced in Bustan al-Basha - though an official in an Aleppo-based rebel group denied there had been a government advance in the area.

Government forces have encircled Aleppo's rebel-held eastern sector in recent weeks with the use of heavy aerial bombardment and are seeking to recapture the whole city.

(Editing by Andrew Heavens)

[END REPORT]
*********